Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bordelon v. Louisiana Dept. of Corrections, 398 So. 2d 1103.
- Joshua L. Adams v. Union Pacific Railroad Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
-
Joshua L. Adams v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
See Bordelon v. Louisiana Dep’t of Corrections
-
Joshua L. Adams v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
See Bordelon v. Louisiana Dep’t of Corrections
- Joshua L. Adams v. Union Pacific Railroad Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
-
Joshua L. Adams v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
See Bordelon v. Louisiana Dep’t of Corrections
- Joshua L. Adams v. Union Pacific Railroad Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
- Adams v. Union Pac. R.R. Co. 273 So. 3d 419 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
- Plaisance v. Louisiana State Penitentiary 57 So. 3d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
-
Ranger Ins. Co. v. State
941 So. 2d 182
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
The Court stated: [W]e find that Bordelon [v. Louisiana Dept. of Corrections, (La.
-
Wooley v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Ins. Co.
893 So. 2d 746
La. 2005
and State v. O'Reilly, 00-2864 (La.5/15/01), , in which we addressed the constitutional validity of an Act that permitted a non-elected commissioner to conduct a hearing on a motion for injunctive relief and to submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for disposition to the district
-
State v. Adams
884 So. 2d 694
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Previously, the supreme court had considered the delegation of authority to a commissioner to conduct a hearing on a motion for an injunction and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations to the district judge for disposition of the motion and determined that this did not unconstitutionally deny the movant "
-
State of Louisiana v. Corey Marquee Adams, Whitney Batiste, and Horatio Adams
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Previously, the supreme court had considered the delegation of authority to a commissioner to conduct a hearing on a motion for an injunction and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations to the district judge for disposition of the motion and determined that this did not unconstitutionally deny the movan
- State v. Umezulike 866 So. 2d 794 La. 2004
-
State v. Umezulike
843 So. 2d 614
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
In Bordelon v. Louisiana Dep’t of Corrections, this court held that La.R.S.
-
State v. O'REILLY
785 So. 2d 768
La. 2001
this court held that La.
-
McCoy v. Stalder
770 So. 2d 447
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
As to the alternative basis for appellant's third assignment of error, which was decided prior to the 1987 amendment to La.
- State v. Brewster 764 So. 2d 969 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
-
Lott v. Department of Public Safety
734 So. 2d 617
La. 1999
1973); (finding no due process infirmity in the use of court appointed commissioners under LSA-R.S.
-
Giles v. Cain
734 So. 2d 109
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
as support for their argument.
- Autrey v. Energy Corp. of America, Inc. 594 So. 2d 1354 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
-
Domingue v. Hartford Insurance Co.
560 So. 2d 87
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
the requirement of a de novo determination of disputed findings or recommendations is what insures that it is the fundamental responsibility of the judge to make the final determination, after the commissioner conducts a hearing and submits proposed findings and recommendations.
- Pogo Producing Co. v. United Gas Pipe Line Co. 511 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
-
Pogo Producing Co. v. United Gas Pipe Line Co.
504 So. 2d 634
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Dept. of Corrections, (La.App.
- Fonte v. Ansardi 493 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
- Taylor v. Treen 446 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- Gould v. State Through La. Dept. of Correct. 435 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
-
WHITNEY NATIONAL BANK OF NEW ORLEANS v. DERBES
436 So. 2d 1185
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
the *1192 court held that R.S.
-
Whitney Nat. Bank of New Orleans v. Derbes
436 So. 2d 1185
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
the *1192 court held that R.S.
- Wells v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ETC. 417 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982