DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williams, 392 So. 2d 448.

37 citing documents.

  • State v. Fletcher 238 So. 3d 1007 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    915 , 63 L.Ed.2d 198 (1980), and its progeny, as well as the Louisiana Supreme Court case of State v. Williams , (La.
  • State v. Lambert 160 So. 3d 1097 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    In its last argument, (superseded by constitutional amendment as stated in State v. Draughter, 13-0914 (La.12/10/13), )..
  • State v. Draughter 130 So. 3d 855 La. 2013
    the court held a person charged under La.
  • Overruled State v. Jenkins 91 So. 3d 1075 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    which held a defendant charged with possession of a firearm by a convicted felon under La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Darrell James Fontenot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    [T]his information may successfully be conveyed in words tailored to a particular individual’s vocabulary and comprehension”), overruled in part on other grounds
  • Distinguished State v. Farinas 28 So. 3d 1132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State of Louisiana v. Dominique J. Casson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    [T]his information may successfully be conveyed in words tailored to a particular individual’s vocabulary and comprehension), overruled in part on other grounds
  • State v. Casson 2 So. 3d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    [T]his information may successfully be conveyed in words tailored to a particular individual’s vocabulary and comprehension”), overruled in part on other grounds
  • State v. Smallwood 955 So. 2d 1264 La. 2007
    [T]his information may successfully be conveyed in words tailored to a particular individual's vocabulary and comprehension)", overruled in part on other grounds
  • State v. Ford 957 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    [T]his information may successfully be conveyed in words tailored to a particular individual’s vocabulary and comprehension), overruled in part on other grounds
  • Overruled State v. Honeycutt 953 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Martin, supra, on other grounds.
  • State v. Mendenhall 944 So. 2d 560 La. 2006
    [T]his information may successfully be conveyed in words tailored to a particular individual's vocabulary and comprehension), overruled in part on other grounds
  • State v. Zachary 829 So. 2d 405 La. 2002
    ("The record of the guilty plea proceeding shows that Martin waived his right to remain silent at that proceeding, but it does not show an intention to waive his right not to testify against himself at a trial."), overruled on other grounds
  • Distinguished State v. Foy 808 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • Overruled State v. Stewart 754 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Martin, supra, on other grounds.
  • State v. Ball 756 So. 2d 275 La. 1999
  • State v. Gaar 746 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Lott 688 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    In support of his argument
  • State v. Washington 621 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
    The Bailey decision followed the Louisiana Supreme Court’s which adopted the approach taken in federal statutes and jurisprudence dealing with possession of firearms by convicted felons.
  • State v. Washington 621 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
    which adopted the approach taken in federal statutes and jurisprudence dealing with possession of firearms by convicted felons.
  • State v. Thornton 611 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
  • State v. Hunt 573 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Richard 550 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Fayard 541 So. 2d 832 La. 1989
    915 , 63 L.Ed.2d 198 (1980)
  • State v. Ross 542 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
    1982) overruled on other grounds; in an attempt to distinguish his case from that of State v. Bowick, supra .
  • State v. Coates 528 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    in which the court reversed a ruling quashing charges brought under § 95.1 against one whose prior guilty plea was entered without a valid waiver of his constitutional rights.
  • State v. Pitre 506 So. 2d 930 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. McCarty 499 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Carr 487 So. 2d 147 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
    In reversing the trial court, the Second Circuit relied heavily on State v. Williams, *148 in which the Louisiana Supreme Court compared Louisiana's statute prohibiting possession of firearms by convicted felons with the comparable federal statute and concluded that: The Louisiana legislature, like Congress, "...
  • Overruled State v. Lawson 474 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Bailey 461 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Wilson 454 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Justice Watson, as organ of the court stated: “The State contends that defendants are barred from a collateral attack on their prior pleas by the decision in Lewis v. United States, 445 U.S. 55 , 100 S.Ct.
  • Overruled State v. Yarbrough 418 So. 2d 503 La. 1982
    which held a defendant could not collaterally attack his prior conviction in a trial under LSA-R.S.
  • State v. Hubbard 414 So. 2d 775 La. 1982
  • Overruled State v. Robicheaux 412 So. 2d 1313 La. 1982
    NOTES [1] , to the extent that the Martin decision allowed an attack on a conviction used as a predicate for a felon with a firearm charge.
  • Overruled State v. Johnson 404 So. 2d 239 La. 1981
    [4] which held that a defendant cannot collaterally attack his prior conviction in a trial under LSA-R.S.
  • Overruled State v. Halsell 403 So. 2d 688 La. 1981
    [2] but only to the extent that the Martin decision allowed an attack on a conviction used as a predicate for a felon with a firearm charge.