DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Fauria, 393 So. 2d 688.

58 citing documents.

  • State v. Carter 130 So. 3d 308 La. 2013
    1758, 1763 , 80 L.Ed.2d 247 (1984), for conducting a brief investigatory detention of defendant “to maintain the status quo momentarily while obtaining more information.” see White, 496 U.S. at 330 , 110 S.Ct.
  • State v. Howard 120 So. 3d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968)
  • State v. Chaplain 114 So. 3d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Lampton 110 So. 3d 557 La. 2013
  • State v. Thompson 93 So. 3d 553 La. 2012
    did not unduly prolong the encounter, as a brief detention “ ‘in order to determine [an individual’s] identity or to maintain the status quo momentarily while obtaining more information,’ [is] the hallmark of an investigatory stop.” Porche , 06-0312 at 6, 943 So.2d at 339 ().
  • State ex rel. C.S. 106 So. 3d 93 La. 2012
    observation of respondent’s furtive movement, and considering that all of the occupants of the vehicle appeared too young to drive, the officer had the requisite particularized objective basis “ ‘to maintain the status quo momentarily while obtaining more information,’ the hallmark of an investigatory stop.” State v. Porche, 06-0312, p. 6 (La.11/29/06), ( cf .
  • State v. Palmer 14 So. 3d 304 La. 2009
    of his car after contraband was discovered inside the residence and the citizen tips were confirmed did not unduly prolong the encounter, as a brief detention “ ‘in order to determine [an individual’s] identity or to maintain the status quo momentarily while obtaining more information,’ [is] the hallmark of an investigatory stop.” Porche , 06-0312 at 6, 943 So.2d at 339 ().
  • State v. Bozeman 6 So. 3d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    We find the coalescence of these circumstances gave the officers a particularized and objective basis for detaining the defendant “to maintain the status quo momentarily while obtaining more information.”
  • State v. Cooper 2 So. 3d 1172 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    P. art. 215.1; Terry v. Ohio, supra
  • State v. Huynh 993 So. 2d 1198 La. 2008
  • State v. Porche 943 So. 2d 335 La. 2006
    see United States v. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1, 7 , 109 S.Ct.
  • State v. Kelley 934 So. 2d 51 La. 2006
  • State v. Knowles 917 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968)
  • State v. Thompson 894 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968)
  • State v. Kang 866 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Sylvester 826 So. 2d 1106 La. 2002
  • State v. Jenkins 805 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968)
  • State v. Sellers 796 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    art. 215.1; Terry v. Ohio, supra
  • State v. Bolden 811 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968)
  • State v. Walker 747 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); *139
  • State v. Davenport 801 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968)
  • State v. Johnson 748 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Lewis 738 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); La.C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Jackson 736 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); State v. White, supra ; La.C.Cr.P.
  • Harrison v. State 721 So. 2d 458 La. 1998
    at 1576 ; ("Inherent in the officer's right to stop a suspect and demand his name, address, and an explanation of his actions is the right to detain him temporarily to verify the information given or to obtain information independently of his cooperation.").
  • State v. Robertson 721 So. 2d 1268 La. 1998
    2158 , 80 L.Ed.2d 543 (1984)
  • State v. Goodjoint 716 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Goodjoint 716 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Huntley 708 So. 2d 1048 La. 1998
    see also California v. Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 623, n. 1 , 111 S.Ct.
  • State v. Hebert 676 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Dorsey 662 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); LSA-C.Cr.P.
  • State v. White 660 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); LSA-C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Gates 630 So. 2d 1345 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
    1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); *1349 LSA-C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Fikes 616 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Fires 616 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Chirlow 617 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
  • State v. Daniels 614 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
    1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); (La.
  • State v. Cabanas 594 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Barnes 592 So. 2d 1352 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
  • State v. Vincelli 555 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Cabanas 552 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Thompson 543 So. 2d 1077 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • State v. White 543 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Valery 532 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. King 520 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Geraci 518 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Sanchez 516 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Harris 506 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Turner 500 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Merchant 490 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986