Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Knowles, 392 So. 2d 651.

150 citing documents.

State v. Downey 744 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Bridgewater 726 So. 2d 987 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
the Louisiana Supreme Court outlined the Blockburger criteria for examining violations of double jeopardy: ...
State v. Bryant 729 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
the court stated the two rules as follows: [Under] the test in Blockburger v. United States, [ 284 U.S. 299 , 52 S.Ct.
State v. Bailey 713 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Pendelton 696 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
the Louisiana Supreme Court outlined the Blockburger criteria for examining double jeopardy violations: ...
State v. Jackson 694 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
the Louisiana Supreme Court outlined the Blockburger criteria for examining violations of double jeopardy: ...
State v. Gaines 688 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
the court stated the two rules as follows: [Under] the test in Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 , 52 S.Ct.
State v. Hebert 688 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Woodberry 686 So. 2d 984 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
the court stated the two rules as follows: [Under] the test in Blockburger v. United States, [ 284 U.S. 299 , 52 S.Ct.
State v. Steward 681 So. 2d 1007 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Sandifer 679 So. 2d 1324 La. 1996
2221, 2225-2226 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977); (La.
State v. Smith 676 So. 2d 1068 La. 1996
State v. Jasper 677 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Wiley 672 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Johnson 667 So. 2d 510 La. 1996
State v. Coates 661 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977)
State v. Ellis 657 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
outlined as follows the Blockburger criteria for examining violations of double jeopardy: *362 "...
City of Baton Rouge v. Ross 654 So. 2d 1311 La. 1995
State v. Warner 653 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977); writ granted, release ordered
State v. Williams 647 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
the court summarized these rules as follows: [Under Blockburger ] "the applicable rule is that where the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions, the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one, is whether each provision requires pr
State v. Bolden 639 So. 2d 721 La. 1994
State v. Deville 632 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Pierre 631 So. 2d 427 La. 1994
State v. Harrison 612 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
the court stated the two rules as follows: [Under] the test in Blockburger , ...
State v. Thornton 611 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Head 598 So. 2d 1202 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
the Louisiana Supreme Court summarized the two tests as follows: , (La.1980), the Court citing Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 , 52 S.Ct.
State v. Powell 598 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977)
State v. Willis 591 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Miller 571 So. 2d 603 La. 1990
the court stated the two rules as follows: [Under] the test in Blockburger v. United States, [ 284 U.S. 299 , 52 S.Ct.
State v. Edgar 570 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Martin 558 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Dozier 553 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Magee 552 So. 2d 1031 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Neal 550 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Brooks 541 So. 2d 801 La. 1989
1189 , 25 L.Ed.2d 469 (1970)
State v. Hargrove 522 So. 2d 1369 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Louisi *1371 ana was then applying both the “same evidence” test and the Blockburger test.
State v. Mills 505 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Farmer 497 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Blache 480 So. 2d 304 La. 1985
State v. Briscoe 471 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
306 (1932); we concluded, in Smith , that conviction on both counts of LSA-R.S.
State v. Kirkley 470 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
the Louisiana Supreme Court citing Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 304 , 52 S.Ct.
State v. Holmes 462 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Smith 461 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Lockhart 457 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Littleton 436 So. 2d 500 La. 1983
State v. Vaughn 431 So. 2d 763 La. 1983
State v. Richards 426 So. 2d 1314 La. 1982
State in Interest of Ruschel 411 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
State v. Knowles 395 So. 2d 678 La. 1981
See State v. Knowles ; writ granted, ruling reversed
State v. Knowles 395 So. 2d 678 La. 1981
In re Patricia J. Knowles, applying for writs of certiorari, review and mandamus, Parish of Ouachita, Nos. 39,274, 39,177 ( ).