DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dunn, 390 So. 2d 525.

39 citing documents.

  • State v. Jackson 259 So. 3d 533 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State v. Carroll 224 So. 3d 1179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Anderson 222 So. 3d 935 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Ellison 168 So. 3d 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Hebert, 02-884 (La.App.
  • State v. Jones 125 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Jones 123 So. 3d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Tatten 116 So. 3d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    For example, this court found the record contained a sufficient affirmative showing of a knowing and express waiver where the record contained a transcript of the plea colloquy indicating an explicit waiver of two of the Boykin rights and a plea of guilty form signed by the defendant, his attorney, and the judge which c
  • State v. Cummings 79 So. 3d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    (holding that the record contained a sufficient affirmative showing of a knowing and express waiver where the record contained a transcript of the plea colloquy indicating an explicit waiver of two of the Boykin rights and a plea ofj^guilty form signed by the defendant, his attorney, and the judge which cont
  • State v. MARKRAY 35 So. 3d 453 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Farinas 28 So. 3d 1132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Accord, (The record showed a sufficient affirmative showing of the Boykin requirements.).
  • State of Louisiana v. Ronald Spencer, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    For example, this court found the record contained a sufficient affirmative showing of a knowing and express waiver where the record contained a transcript of the plea colloquy indicating an explicit waiver of two of the Boykin rights and a plea of guilty form signed by the defendant, his attorne
  • State v. Spencer 888 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    For example, this court found the record contained a sufficient affirmative showing of a knowing and express waiver where the record contained a transcript of the plea colloquy indicating an explicit waiver of two of the Boykin rights and a plea of guilty form signed by the defendant, his attorney, and the judge which c
  • State v. Hebert 838 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Marcoux 691 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • State v. Martin 688 So. 2d 1259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • State v. Shelton 621 So. 2d 769 La. 1993
    For example, this court found the record contained a sufficient affirmative showing of a knowing and express waiver where the record contained a transcript of the plea colloquy indicating an explicit waiver of two of the Boykin rights and a plea of guilty form signed by the defendant, his attorney, and the judge which c
  • State v. Martin 599 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
  • State v. Verrett 536 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    the Supreme Court suggested that a “plea of guilty form” may be considered in determining whether the defendant was adequately informed of his rights.
  • State v. Johnson 533 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Wilkerson 533 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    for the proposition that a “plea of guilty” form is properly considered by the trial court to determine whether or not the defendant has been *138 adequately informed of his rights.
  • State v. Conley 531 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Kelly 524 So. 2d 123 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Williams 483 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Junegain 478 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Rome 469 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Arrington 455 So. 2d 1284 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Britton 450 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Santiago 416 So. 2d 524 La. 1982
    this court held that a plea of guilty form may be considered along with a colloquy between the judge and the defendant in determining whether defendant was adequately informed of his constitutional rights and made an express and knowing waiver of those rights.
  • State v. Bosworth 415 So. 2d 912 La. 1982
  • State v. Age 417 So. 2d 1183 La. 1982
  • State v. Lawson 410 So. 2d 1101 La. 1982
  • State v. Washington 406 So. 2d 191 La. 1981
    However, this court upheld the trial court's refusal to set aside a guilty plea although the colloquy *194 between the trial judge and the defendant did not include an explanation to the defendant of his right against self-incrimination.
  • State v. Washington 406 So. 2d 191 La. 1981
    However, this court upheld the trial court’s refusal to set aside a guilty plea although the colloquy *194 between the trial judge and the defendant did not include an explanation to the defendant of his right against self-incrimination.
  • State v. Tucker 405 So. 2d 506 La. 1981
  • State v. Halsell 403 So. 2d 688 La. 1981
  • State ex rel. Milton v. Blackburn 400 So. 2d 1080 La. 1981
  • State v. Cusher 400 So. 2d 601 La. 1981
    [1] The Court did create somewhat of a (La.
  • State v. Warren 402 So. 2d 662 La. 1981
    [1] The Court did create somewhat of a (La.
  • State v. Williams 400 So. 2d 868 La. 1981
    [1] The Court did create somewhat of a (La.