Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Duncan, 396 So. 2d 297.

22 citing documents.

Kim Doucet, Et Ux. v. Keith Alleman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Doucet v. Alleman 175 So. 3d 1107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Sims 33 So. 3d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Hicks 30 So. 3d 1081 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Robinson 19 So. 3d 1206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Wilson 833 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
State v. Hancock 748 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Stewart 732 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Williams 681 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Dorsey 672 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Williams 596 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Jenkins 595 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
In reaching its decision the Alexander court recognized that, although the habitual offender proceeding is in the nature of an enhancement of penalty, rather than a prosecution, State v. Stott principles of fundamental fairness dictated by the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibit inordinate delays
State v. McCoy 586 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
City of Winnfield v. Weems 545 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Thompson 539 So. 2d 1008 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Alexander, supra .
State v. Coates 528 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Alexander 503 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Davis 480 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
[7] the court indicated that revocation of probation is not mandated when there has been a felony conviction for conduct occurring during the term of probation; however, the Duncan court upheld the defendant's revocation due to a felony conviction.
State v. McCarter 469 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Milson 458 So. 2d 1037 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Manuel 426 So. 2d 140 La. 1983
State v. Jenkins 419 So. 2d 463 La. 1982

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by