DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Curry, 400 So. 2d 614.

42 citing documents.

  • La. 2020
  • State v. Hoffman 768 So. 2d 542 La. 2000
    ("The coincidence of man with red checked shirt, the man with blue jacket, the information of armed robbery and attempt to murder earlier that day, information that cab had been abandoned in Franklin, altogether..
  • State v. Silvie 721 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    It has been held by the supreme court that where there is a specific sentence agreed upon in a plea bargain, “that sentence cannot be appealed as excessive and there is no need for the trial judge to give reasons for the sentence_”
  • State v. Wiley 597 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Vail 571 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Williams 567 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    officers likewise contended they had not effected an arrest until after finding marijuana, but the court concluded it lawfully occurred earlier and justified the search.
  • State v. Head 556 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Bonnett 535 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Prejean 520 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Lea 499 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Alfonso 496 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Gillen 480 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Green 480 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    it was noted that: The trial court is required to comply with the sentencing guidelines of LSA-C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Rice 471 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    which held that when the sentence is the result of plea bargaining culminating in a plea of guilty with the sentence to be given understood and agreed to there was no necessity to articulate reasons for sentence under Art. 894.1.
  • State v. White 458 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Blanchard 450 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Green 449 So. 2d 1164 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Coats 449 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
    held that "where a specific sentence has been agreed to as a consequence of a plea bargain, that sentence cannot be appealed as excessive and there is no need for the trial judge to give reasons for the sentence as required by Article 894.1, "
  • State v. Dickerson 446 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Gordon 444 So. 2d 1188 La. 1984
  • State v. Brown 441 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    we said: “The sentence for the possession of methamphetamines (81-KA-0275) was the result of plea bargaining culminating in a plea of guilty with the sentence to be given understood and agreed to.
  • State v. Wilson 441 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    held that as the sentence imposed was the result of an understood and agreed to plea bargain, “there was no necessity of listing enumerated reasons and [we believe] that the defendant cannot complain of excessive length, [citations omitted].” This approach has been more recently upheld in State v. Edwar
  • State v. Murdock 438 So. 2d 1314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Wilson 438 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Bell 438 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • Criticized State v. Lewis 434 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Edwards 434 So. 2d 395 La. 1983
  • State v. Gray 434 So. 2d 447 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Edwards 432 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    State v. *320 Bell, (La.App.
  • Criticized State v. Benton 432 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Smith 430 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
    The state supreme court, held that the trial judge is relieved of his statutory duty to articulate reasons for sentences, where, as here, the specific sentence has been agreed to as a consequence of plea bargaining.
  • State v. Brown 427 So. 2d 1284 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Buckenburger 428 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Owens 426 So. 2d 367 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Smack 425 So. 2d 737 La. 1983
  • State v. Shea 421 So. 2d 200 La. 1982
  • State v. Bell 412 So. 2d 1335 La. 1982
    It has been held by this court that where a specific sentence has been agreed to as a consequence of a plea bargain, that sentence cannot be appealed as excessive and there is no need for the trial judge to give reasons for the sentence as required by Article 894.1
  • State v. Washington 406 So. 2d 191 La. 1981
    answered these questions affirmatively.
  • State v. Washington 406 So. 2d 191 La. 1981
    answered these questions affirmatively.
  • State v. Gray 404 So. 2d 1215 La. 1981
  • State v. Bateman 404 So. 2d 927 La. 1981
  • State v. Hicks 403 So. 2d 676 La. 1981
    we said: "The sentence for the possession of methamphetamines (81-KA-0275) was the result of plea bargaining culminating in a plea of guilty with the sentence to be given understood and agreed to.