Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bodley, 394 So. 2d 584.
-
State v. Carr
530 So. 2d 579
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
988 , 39 L.Ed.2d 242 (1974)
- State v. Gale 526 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
- State v. DiLosa 529 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
- State v. Thorne 526 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- State v. Cheatham 519 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
-
State v. Sanchez
516 So. 2d 415
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
988 , 39 L.Ed.2d 242 (1974)
- State v. Graham 513 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
- State v. Moten 510 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
-
State v. Martin
508 So. 2d 152
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
794 , 46 L.Ed.2d 649 (1976)
- State v. Schrader 506 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
-
State v. Smith
504 So. 2d 1070
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
988 , 39 L.Ed.2d 242 (1974)
- State v. Dupre 500 So. 2d 873 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- State v. Leonard 499 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
- State v. Caldwell 493 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
- State v. Newman 491 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
- State v. Whitaker 489 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
-
State v. Thompson
489 So. 2d 1364
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
See, State v. Bodley; (La.App.
-
State v. Walker
489 So. 2d 353
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Harris, supra; Davis, supra
-
State v. Carter
485 So. 2d 260
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
988 , 39 L.Ed.2d 242 (1974); (La.App.
-
State v. Owens
480 So. 2d 826
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
988 , 39 L.Ed.2d 242 (1974); (La.
-
State v. Watson
477 So. 2d 788
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
988 , 39 L.Ed.2d 242 (1974); State v. Bodley, *792 (5th Cir.1984).
-
State v. Price
476 So. 2d 989
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
988 , 39 L.Ed.2d 242 (1974)
-
State v. Hardeman
467 So. 2d 1163
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Lindsey, supra; State v. Eason, supra.
-
State v. Eason
460 So. 2d 1139
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
1983); State v. Lindsey, supra
-
State v. Nelson
459 So. 2d 510
La. 1984
and State v. Rideau, 249 La.
- State v. Harper 458 So. 2d 1030 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Helsley 457 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
- State v. Seymour 449 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
- State v. Heath 447 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Watson 449 So. 2d 1321 La. 1984
-
State v. Cody
446 So. 2d 1278
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
1420 , 22 L.Ed.2d 684 (1969); (La.
- State v. Booker 444 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Kirkpatrick 443 So. 2d 546 La. 1983
- State v. Henry 440 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
-
State v. Banks
439 So. 2d 407
La. 1983
Finally, certain out of court statements made by defendant were admitted.
- State v. Cormier 438 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
-
State v. Glaze
439 So. 2d 605
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
The trial judge sustained the objection
-
State v. Willis
438 So. 2d 605
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
the Supreme Court addressed the question of whether certain statements were inculpatory under article 768.
- State v. MacK 435 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
-
State v. Smith
433 So. 2d 688
La. 1983
State v. Johnson , supra; *698
- State v. Banks 428 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
- State v. Small 427 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
-
State v. Tonubbee
420 So. 2d 126
La. 1982
In regard to defendant's argument that his offer to stipulate as to the contents of the gruesome photographs was refused, : "...
-
State v. McCabe
420 So. 2d 955
La. 1982
*958 this Court held that "[w]hile an indigent defendant has a right to counsel as well as the opposite right to represent himself, he has no constitutional right to be both represented and representative."
- State v. West 419 So. 2d 868 La. 1982
-
State v. Russell
416 So. 2d 1283
La. 1982
where the defendant, known to the person to whom he was talking, stated that the deceased was doing fine and had gone to work that morning.
- State v. Smith 418 So. 2d 515 La. 1982
- State v. Harris 414 So. 2d 325 La. 1982
-
State v. Stephens
412 So. 2d 1057
La. 1982
this court defined "inculpatory statement" as used in Article 768 as "an out-of-court admission of incriminating facts made by the defendant after the crime has been committed".
- State v. Chapman 410 So. 2d 689 La. 1982