Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Walker, 394 So. 2d 1181.

39 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Terez Ard La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
State v. Colby 244 So. 3d 1260 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
ttern of domestic abuse goes directly to rebut defenses defendant may raise at trial and demonstrates their independent relevancy besides merely painting defendant as a bad person"); State v. Rose , supra (evidence that the defendant previously physically abused the victim was admissible to show motive for her murder and to demonstrate the volatile nature of their relationship); State v. Walker , (La.
State v. Lyons 241 So. 3d 1153 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
1981) (stating the State "served defendant with notice of its intention to introduce evidence of prior acts of violence by defendant as well as certain statements and threats made toward the deceased child."); State v. Walker , , 1184-85 (La.
State v. Hunter 176 So. 3d 530 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See State v. Rose, 06-0402, p. 15 (La.2/22/07), (evidence that the defendant previously physically abused the victim was admissible to show motive for her murder and to demonstrate the volatile nature of their relationship); -84 (La.1981) (evidence that defendant and victim had a volatile relationship and that defendant had a bad temper was relevant to show the commission of the offense and intent).
State v. Castillo 167 So. 3d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
("Clearly, evidence that defendant and his ex-wife, the person to whom defendant's alleged criminal conduct was directed, had had a poor marital relationship and that defendant had a bad temper'was relevant as tending to show the commission of the offense [aggravated criminal damage to property] and th
State v. Marshall 128 So. 3d 1156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
a case in which the State sought to elicit testimony as to defendant’s motive, the Louisiana Supreme Court observed, “Clearly, evidence that defendant and his ex-wife, the person to whom defendant’s *1161 alleged criminal conduct was directed, had had a poor marital relationship and that defendant had a bad temper was relevant as tending to show the commission of the offense ...”
State v. Granger 103 So. 3d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
the victim saw defendant, her ex-husband, at a lounge while celebrating her recent engagement to another man.
State v. Adams 89 So. 3d 435 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
the victim saw defendant, her ex-husband, at a lounge while celebrating her recent engagement to another man.
State of Louisiana v. Lester Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
in which the State sought to elicit testimony as to defendant’s motive, this court observed, “Clearly, evidence that defendant and his ex-wife, the person to whom defendant’s alleged criminal conduct was directed, had had a poor marital relationship and that defendant had a bad temper was relevant as tending to show the commission of the offense....”
State of Louisiana v. Ricky Joseph Langley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
28 Similarly, the supreme court has stated, “Because the proceeding was a bench trial, the possibility for prejudicial effect on the trial judge was far less than upon a jury.”
State v. Langley 61 So. 3d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
| ^Similarly, the supreme court has stated, “Because the proceeding was a bench trial, the possibility for prejudicial effect on the trial judge was far less than upon a jury.”
State v. Lawson 1 So. 3d 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Cotton 980 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Rose 949 So. 2d 1236 La. 2007
State v. Davenport 771 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Hills 761 So. 2d 516 La. 2000
(holding "[t]he testimony of ...
State v. Gipson 677 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Welch 615 So. 2d 300 La. 1993
State v. Brooks 541 So. 2d 801 La. 1989
State v. Dauzat 532 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
the court examined other crimes evidence allowed for the showing of motive.
State v. Lofton 528 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Franklin 520 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Smith 513 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Cormier 487 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. McShane 484 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Guarisco 466 So. 2d 1356 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
The defendant urges that the additional factors, should also have been considered.
State v. Johnson 458 So. 2d 539 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Sutfield, supra .
State v. Kahey 436 So. 2d 475 La. 1983
State v. Goodman 427 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Smith 418 So. 2d 515 La. 1982
State v. Davis 411 So. 2d 2 La. 1982
State v. Sherer 411 So. 2d 1050 La. 1982
State v. Goza 408 So. 2d 1349 La. 1982
State v. Moore, supra; State v. Vernon, supra .
State v. Rives 407 So. 2d 1195 La. 1981
State v. McDermitt 406 So. 2d 195 La. 1981
State v. Coleman 406 So. 2d 563 La. 1981
State v. Bernard 404 So. 2d 914 La. 1981
State v. Alpine 404 So. 2d 213 La. 1981
See, e. g., where a state expert examined shotgun wadding at a noon recess, the state immediately notified the defense of the test results, and we found there was no breach of the continuing duty to disclose under C.Cr.P.
State v. Brown 398 So. 2d 1381 La. 1981