Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Roy, 395 So. 2d 664.

83 citing documents.

State v. Cook 460 So. 2d 1075 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
the Louisiana Supreme Court adopted the Jackson v. Virginia standard of review when a defendant pleads the affirmative defense of insanity and claims that the record evidence shows that he had proven his affirmative defense of insanity by a preponderance of the evidence.
State v. Cheatwood 458 So. 2d 907 La. 1984
this court employed a standard similar to the latter standard in reviewing the evidence offered in support of the affirmative defense of insanity.
State v. Mitchell 459 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
This court believes the standard of review is correctly set forth in State v. Pettaway, supra, per curiam on application for rehearing; and other Louisiana Supreme Court cases.
State v. Monk 454 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Welcome 458 So. 2d 1235 La. 1984
14:14; See generally, Note, The Insanity Defense in Louisiana: Presumptions, Burden of Proof, and Appellate Review, 42 La.L.Rev.
State v. Birdsong 452 So. 2d 1236 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Guidry 450 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Seymour 449 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. David, supra; La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Pettaway 450 So. 2d 1345 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Nealy 450 So. 2d 634 La. 1984
3088 , 61 L.Ed.2d 865 (1979) (per curiam)
State v. Heath 447 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Shields 444 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Hamilton 441 So. 2d 1192 La. 1983
State v. Chapman 438 So. 2d 1319 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Deaton 438 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); 1 It is thus necessary for us to review the facts.
State v. Gerone 435 So. 2d 1132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
We find a rehearing denied, March 2, 1981.
State v. Love 434 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Thompson 429 So. 2d 862 La. 1983
226 , 50 L.Ed.2d 160 (1976); (La.
State v. Narcisse 426 So. 2d 118 La. 1983
15:432), the state is not required to offer proof of sanity ( (La.
State v. David 425 So. 2d 1241 La. 1983
State v. Brogdon 426 So. 2d 158 La. 1983
State v. Sharp 418 So. 2d 1344 La. 1982
[7] See State v. Claibon, 395 So.2d *1348 770 (La.1981); (La.
State v. Brown 414 So. 2d 689 La. 1982
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Love 410 So. 2d 1045 La. 1982
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Rives 407 So. 2d 1195 La. 1981
State in Interest of Aaron 405 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
2151 , 64 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980)
State v. Liner 406 So. 2d 1312 La. 1981
State v. Price 403 So. 2d 660 La. 1981
In Interest of Franklin 399 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
2151 , 64 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980)
State v. Motton 395 So. 2d 1337 La. 1981
State v. Claibon 395 So. 2d 770 La. 1981
State v. Lee 395 So. 2d 700 La. 1981
State v. Toomer 395 So. 2d 1320 La. 1981
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)