Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Johnson, 438 So. 2d 1091.

156 citing documents.

State v. Roberts 769 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Lipscomb 770 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Coldman 769 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Carey, 609 So.2d at 898
State v. Wesley 759 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Ballay 757 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
-1102 (La.1983); -863 (La.App.
State v. Pollard 760 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Carey, 609 So.2d at 898
State v. Jenkins 750 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. LaCaze 759 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
where the missing portion of the transcript consisted not of testimony, but of the argument of counsel.
State v. Mariengy 734 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Bagent 734 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Sims 734 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
the Supreme Court concluded that under the mandatory language of the former version of LSA-C.Cr.P.
State v. Pitts 739 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Davis 726 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Hubbard, 97-916 (La.App.
State v. Harris 727 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Carey, 609 So.2d at 898
State v. Cedrington 725 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Dorsey 718 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
State v. Jasper, 28,187 (La.App.
State v. Walker 710 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Hubbard 708 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Johnson, *1106 State v. Gilmore (La.App.
State v. Ortiz 701 So. 2d 922 La. 1997
2d Cir. 1984), writ denied
State v. Small 693 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Ford, supra ; State v. Diaz, 93-1309 (La.04/06/94), ; (La.App.
State v. Taylor 688 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
The Louisiana Supreme Court, (La.
State v. Lavalais 685 So. 2d 1048 La. 1996
2d Cir. 1984), writ denied, (La.
State v. Jasper 677 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Tart 672 So. 2d 116 La. 1996
held: A slight inaccuracy in a record or an inconsequential omission from it which is immaterial to a proper determination of the appeal would not cause us to reverse defendant's conviction.
State v. Foster 669 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Crossley 653 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
State v. Mamon 648 So. 2d 1347 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Ford, supra; State v. Diaz, 93-1309 (La.
State v. Harris 645 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Giles 639 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Martin 638 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
(5th Cir.1985), writ denied
State v. Clark 638 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
where the missing portion of the transcript consisted not of testimony, but of the argument of counsel.
State v. Ray 623 So. 2d 190 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Richardson 616 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
State v. Carey 609 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Williams 606 So. 2d 1387 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Daniels 607 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Mitchell 606 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Hand 599 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Vergo 594 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Jones 593 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Lewis 590 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
[2] -99 (La.1989); State v. Perkins, 423 So.2d at 1109-1110 .
State v. Lobato 588 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
2d Cir.1984), writ denied
State v. Velez 588 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. Ondek 584 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State ex rel. Whiticar v. Butler 576 So. 2d 515 La. 1991
State v. Stanford 574 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Hearold 567 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Bland 558 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
State v. Lee 559 So. 2d 1310 La. 1990
State v. Cage 554 So. 2d 39 La. 1989