Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Temple, 394 So. 2d 259.

34 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Taveon Malik Leary La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Jarrett Andrews La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Andrews 265 So. 3d 1078 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Tompkins , ; State v. Temple , ; State v. Peterson
State of Louisiana v. Robert Lee Heard, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Heard 258 So. 3d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Tompkins , ; State v. Temple , ; State v. Peterson
State v. Murray 161 So. 3d 918 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Jones 46 So. 3d 756 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Tillman 7 So. 3d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Burnes 997 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Ruffins 748 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Ruffins 748 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Anderson 707 So. 2d 1223 La. 1998
*1225 (La.1980); State v. Smith, 26,622 (La.App.2d Cir. 3/1/95), ; see also 2 W. LaFave, A. Scott, Substantive Criminal Law, § 6.7, p. 138 (West 1996) ("It is sufficient encouragement that the accomplice is standing by at the scene of the crime ready to give some aid if needed, although in such a case it
State v. Green 691 So. 2d 1273 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Thompson 665 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. George 661 So. 2d 975 La. 1995
State v. Pipkins 628 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Nugent 580 So. 2d 1002 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
9 Since they are mitigatory factors, a defendant who establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that he acted in a `sudden passion' or `heat of blood' is entitled to a manslaughter verdict.10 Where such proof has been introduced, a second degree murder verdict
State Ex Rel. Lawrence v. Smith 571 So. 2d 133 La. 1990
State v. Gibson 529 So. 2d 1347 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Holley 528 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Mallett 526 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Lombard 486 So. 2d 106 La. 1986
State v. Collier 474 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Verrett 467 So. 2d 1290 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Shepard 468 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Dill 461 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
State v. Willis 459 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
reveals that the ‘sudden passion’ or ‘heat of blood’ provisions operate in a mitigatory fashion in a murder presecution [sic], not a great deal unlike provisions in the criminal law of other jurisdictions where such factors are considered to be ‘affirmative defenses’ to a charge of murder.” (footnote omitted) the court said: “When the state has adduced sufficient evidence to obtain a murder conviction, yet the defendant is convicted of manslaughter, the state’s failure to prove elements such as
State v. Bosley 454 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Chelette 453 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Russell 448 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Freeman 447 So. 2d 1145 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Harvill 403 So. 2d 706 La. 1981
State v. Edwards 400 So. 2d 1370 La. 1981
State v. Tompkins 403 So. 2d 644 La. 1981