Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Adams, 394 So. 2d 1204.
-
State v. Anderson
440 So. 2d 205
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
(Justice ad hoc Guidry), to be persuasive: "This Court has previously recognized that in prosecutions of sex offenses the better rule is that the original complaint of a young child is admissible when the particular facts and circumstances of the case indicate that it was a product of the shocking episode an
- State v. Neslo 433 So. 2d 73 La. 1983
-
State v. Alexander
430 So. 2d 621
La. 1983
This Court has condoned a trial court ruling which allowed a witness' testimony as to whether the defendant was passive, or not shocked when an armed robber entered the store, and a mother's testimony as to whether the victim was scared of the defendant
- State v. Vaccaro 411 So. 2d 415 La. 1982
-
State v. Rodrigue
409 So. 2d 556
La. 1982
[1] Although the trial court possesses a broad range of discretion in this area, see, we are required to make an independent evaluation of the circumstances to determine whether the accused can receive a fair trial in the parish, unfettered by outside influence.
- State v. Giovanni 409 So. 2d 593 La. 1982
-
State v. Willie
410 So. 2d 1019
La. 1982
[1] Although *1024 the trial court possesses a broad range of discretion in this area, see, we are required to make an independent evaluation of the facts to determine whether the accused received a fair trial, unfettered by outside influences.
- State v. Middlebrook 409 So. 2d 588 La. 1982
- State v. Wilkerson 403 So. 2d 652 La. 1981
- State v. McDonald 404 So. 2d 889 La. 1981
- State v. Prestridge 399 So. 2d 564 La. 1981