Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite City of Monroe v. Wyrick, 393 So. 2d 1273.
- State v. McCorvey 187 So. 3d 41 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
- State v. Stanfield 137 So. 3d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
- State v. Hayes 107 So. 3d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
- State v. Carter 84 So. 3d 499 La. 2012
- State v. Bell 53 So. 3d 437 La. 2010
-
State v. Filer
762 So. 2d 1080
La. 2000
that the accused was made aware by the trial judge of his right to a jury trial, his right to confront accusers, and his privilege against compulsory self-incrimination.") (citations omitted), and while the failure of a trial judge to address the defendant individually as well as personally may undermine the validity of any subsequent waiver of his constitutional rights, the knowing and intelligent waiver of the defendant's rights "depends upon the circumstances of each case."
-
Distinguished
State v. Inzina
728 So. 2d 458
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
2d Cir.1984), writ denied overruled by State v. Strain, supra , relied upon by the defendant.
- State v. Lambert 720 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
- State v. Sadler 693 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
- State v. Hattaway 621 So. 2d 796 La. 1993
- State v. Rivers 614 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
- State v. Lawrence 600 So. 2d 1341 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
-
State v. Strain
585 So. 2d 540
La. 1991
which reversed a simple battery conviction when the trial judge, without inquiring into the literacy, competency or understanding of any individual defendant, merely mentioned to all present in the courtroom that they had the right to be represented by an attorney and "may be entitled" to an appointed lawye
- State v. Strain 573 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
-
State v. Fontenot
535 So. 2d 433
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
The importance of having a record from a
-
State v. Gipson
514 So. 2d 646
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Faretta, supra; State, writ denied
- State v. Graham 513 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
-
State v. Hart
472 So. 2d 280
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
[1] the following colloquy was given in an en masse address and found to be insufficient to obtain a valid waiver of the defendant's right to counsel: "Everyone knows these days, but I'll just mention it again, that you have the right to be represented by an attorney.
- State, City of Bossier City v. Walpole 459 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
- State v. Nevels 457 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Washington 421 So. 2d 887 La. 1982