Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite City of Monroe v. Wyrick, 393 So. 2d 1273.

21 citing documents.

  • State v. McCorvey 187 So. 3d 41 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Stanfield 137 So. 3d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Hayes 107 So. 3d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Carter 84 So. 3d 499 La. 2012
  • State v. Bell 53 So. 3d 437 La. 2010
  • State v. Filer 762 So. 2d 1080 La. 2000
    that the accused was made aware by the trial judge of his right to a jury trial, his right to confront accusers, and his privilege against compulsory self-incrimination.") (citations omitted), and while the failure of a trial judge to address the defendant individually as well as personally may undermine the validity of any subsequent waiver of his constitutional rights, the knowing and intelligent waiver of the defendant's rights "depends upon the circumstances of each case."
  • Distinguished State v. Inzina 728 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    2d Cir.1984), writ denied overruled by State v. Strain, supra , relied upon by the defendant.
  • State v. Lambert 720 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Sadler 693 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • State v. Hattaway 621 So. 2d 796 La. 1993
  • State v. Rivers 614 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Lawrence 600 So. 2d 1341 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Strain 585 So. 2d 540 La. 1991
    which reversed a simple battery conviction when the trial judge, without inquiring into the literacy, competency or understanding of any individual defendant, merely mentioned to all present in the courtroom that they had the right to be represented by an attorney and "may be entitled" to an appointed lawye
  • State v. Strain 573 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Fontenot 535 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    The importance of having a record from a
  • State v. Gipson 514 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    Faretta, supra; State, writ denied
  • State v. Graham 513 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Hart 472 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    [1] the following colloquy was given in an en masse address and found to be insufficient to obtain a valid waiver of the defendant's right to counsel: "Everyone knows these days, but I'll just mention it again, that you have the right to be represented by an attorney.
  • State, City of Bossier City v. Walpole 459 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Nevels 457 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Washington 421 So. 2d 887 La. 1982