Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Parish, 405 So. 2d 1080.

88 citing documents.

State v. Trackling 609 So. 2d 206 La. 1992
Such proof is indispensable because specific intent to accomplish the offense is the sine qua non of the criminal offense of attempt, (La.
State v. Benedict 607 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Jackson 601 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
State v. Henderson 566 So. 2d 1098 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Porter 547 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. McIntyre 544 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Headley 541 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
in support of his position that the evidence supports a conviction of forcible rape, but not aggravated rape.
State v. Volkmann 539 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Lanerie 527 So. 2d 1146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
(on rehearing), affirmed after remand, the court in State v. Willie, supra, stated: “...
State v. Dean 528 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Saltzman 520 So. 2d 1008 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
(on rehearing), affirmed after remand, and said: “We concluded that it was the legislative aim to divide the continuum of acts of coerced sexual intercourse into two categories, aggravated rape and forcible rape, thereby assigning to the jury the function of fixing the range of permis
State v. Schenck 513 So. 2d 1159 La. 1987
on rehearing, upheld after remand
State v. Poydras 514 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Creel 508 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Hebert 506 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
on rehearing, the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that the legal definition of aggravated rape set forth in LSA-R.S.
State v. Brown 504 So. 2d 1055 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
14:10 and 14:27; on rehearing, appeal after remand, (La.App.
State v. Helaire 496 So. 2d 1322 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Scott 496 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
14:10 and 14:27; on rehearing, appeal after remand, (La.App.
State v. Burnett 496 So. 2d 1236 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
The Supreme Court of Louisiana, in State v. Parish [1] , at page 1087 explained: "...it was the legislative aim to divide the continuum of acts of coerced sexual intercourse into two categories, aggravated rape and forcible rape, thereby assigning to the jury the function of fixing the range of permissible punishment for convicted offenders by returning a verdict
State v. Magee 491 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Wallace 484 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
to support his position.
State v. Moore 477 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
14:10 and 27; on rehearing, appeal after remand, (La.
State v. Kirkley 470 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Papillion 467 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
(on rehearing); (La.App.
State v. Grissom 467 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Gray 461 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
14:10;27; on rehearing, appeal after remand
State v. Robertson 454 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Hunter 454 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Foley 456 So. 2d 979 La. 1984
State v. Sosa 446 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
(on rehearing), also, (La.
State v. Hall 441 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Alexander 437 So. 2d 991 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Jackson 437 So. 2d 855 La. 1983
we noted that the legal definition of aggravated rape set forth in La.R.S.
State v. Clark 437 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Parish 429 So. 2d 442 La. 1983
State v. Napoli 428 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
[5] a case involving attempted aggravated rape, at page 1087 in footnote 4, the court indicated that "[T]he trial judge correctly instructed the jury as to the essential elements and penalties of each offense."
State v. Willie 422 So. 2d 1128 La. 1982
Recently, (on rehearing), we held that although the legal definition of aggravated rape as set forth in La.R.S.
State v. Rives 407 So. 2d 1195 La. 1981