DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Beavers, 394 So. 2d 1218.

18 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Wayne Montgomery La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    Additionally, (citations omitted), it is equally well settled that: [A] motion for recusal must set forth allegations of fact which state a statutory cause for recusation before the trial judge is required to refer the motion to another judge.
  • State v. Montgomery 158 So. 3d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Additionally, (citations omitted), it is equally well settled that: [A] motion for recusal must set forth allegations of fact which state a statutory cause for recusation before the trial judge is required to refer the motion to another judge.
  • State of Louisiana v. Nicholas Demond Pitree La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    impartial trial.” Further, Article 674 provides “If a valid ground for recusation is set forth in the motion, the judge shall either recuse himself, or refer the motion for hearing to another judge or to a judge ad hoc, as provided in Article 675.” Construing these articles, stated: Under the jurisprudence interpreting there (sic) articles, a motion for recusal must set forth allegations of fact which state a statutory cause for recusation before the trial judge is r
  • State v. Pitree 930 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Construing these articles, stated: Under the jurisprudence interpreting there (sic) articles, a motion for recusal must set forth allegations of fact which state a statutory cause for recusation before the trial judge is required to refer the motion to another judge.
  • State v. Maten 899 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Construing these articles, stated: Under the jurisprudence interpreting there (sic) articles, a motion for recusal must set forth allegations of fact which state a statutory cause for recusation before the trial judge is required to refer the motion to another judge.
  • City of Baton Rouge v. Ross 654 So. 2d 1311 La. 1995
  • State v. Carr 618 So. 2d 1098 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • State v. Brown 546 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Thompson 544 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Foster 510 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. McCarty 499 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Reese 472 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Nolen 461 So. 2d 1073 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Anderson 440 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    (Justice ad hoc Stoker).
  • State v. Ruple 437 So. 2d 873 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    (defendant not prejudiced by inclusion of a responsive verdict on which trier of fact made no finding).
  • State v. Morris 429 So. 2d 111 La. 1983
  • State v. West 419 So. 2d 868 La. 1982
  • State v. Prestridge 399 So. 2d 564 La. 1981