DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Washington, 407 So. 2d 1138.

58 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Eric Joseph Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Smith 58 So. 3d 964 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Nicholas 51 So. 3d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    (where trailer owner’s consent to search of premises, including areas used by guest, resulted in seizure of admissible evidence against the guest)
  • State v. MERANTA 30 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Hollins 15 So. 3d 69 La. 2009
    An accomplice’s testimony is corroborated “if there is evidence that confirms material points in an accomplice’s tale, and confirms the defendant’s identity and some relationship to the situation.” Schaffuer, supra at 1035; Murray, supra at 88-89 .
  • State v. Lathan 953 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    2d Cir.9/25/98), , writ denied, 98-2723 (La.2/5/99), ; see also
  • State v. Brooks 914 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Owens, 30,903 (La.App.2d Cir.9/25/98), , writ denied, 1998-2723 (La.2/5/99), .
  • State v. Tate 851 So. 2d 921 La. 2003
  • State v. McCullough 774 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    the supreme court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion for continuance where the defense failed to show it was probable that the unavailable witness would be available to testify at a later date.
  • State v. Edwards 750 So. 2d 893 La. 1999
    (where trailer owner's consent to search of premises, including areas used by guest, resulted in seizure of admissible evidence against the guest)
  • State v. Howard 751 So. 2d 783 La. 1999
    Schaffner, 398 So.2d at 1035 ; Murray, 375 So.2d at 88 .
  • State v. Castleberry 758 So. 2d 749 La. 1999
  • State v. Meads 734 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • State v. Bailey 713 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    Simpson, 403 So.2d at 1216 .
  • State v. Bullard 700 So. 2d 1051 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Meyers 683 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Fanguy 643 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    the Louisiana Supreme Court, (La.
  • State v. Tasby 639 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Bourque 622 So. 2d 198 La. 1993
    Simpson, 403 So.2d at 1216 .
  • State v. Jones 596 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    See also: -1148 (La.1981); -1354 (La.1980).
  • State v. Mitchell 572 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Gibson 572 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Cologne 562 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Williams 554 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Johnston 546 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Hill 534 So. 2d 1296 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    At trial, defendant could have made an oral motion for continuance, State v. Clark, 437 So.2d at 879 ; State v. Burns, 504 So.2d at 132 , prior to the selection and seating of the jury; motioned for a recess in order to locate his witness, or preserved his claim in some other timely fashion.
  • State v. Ford 525 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    : “The Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 709 provides: A Motion for a continuance based upon the absence of a witness must state: (1) Facts to which the absent witness is expected to testify, showing the materiality of the testimony and the necessity for the presence of the witness at the trial; (2) Facts a
  • State v. Seifert 524 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    Similarly, the court found no error in the trial court's refusal to order the state to obtain "rap sheets" on State witnesses.
  • State v. Burns 504 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Roy 496 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Hobdy 494 So. 2d 1321 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Vampran 491 So. 2d 1356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    The trial court followed the rule promulgated in Harvey ; (La.App.
  • State v. Davis 485 So. 2d 981 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Pennington 485 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Rovira 483 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Ball 482 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Jones 478 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Watson 477 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Johnson 473 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. White 472 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Corkern 461 So. 2d 1238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Washington 463 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
    art. 712 and the Official Revision Comment thereunder
  • State v. James 459 So. 2d 1299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Dixon 457 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Hodge 457 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Whitlock 454 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    Similarly, the court found no error in the trial court's refusal to order the state to obtain "rap sheets" on state witnesses.
  • State v. Alexandra 451 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Spencer 444 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Ditcharo 441 So. 2d 326 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Johnson 440 So. 2d 856 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983