Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Molinet, 393 So. 2d 721.

33 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Jimmy F. Kuykendall, Jr. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
State v. Alexander 976 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Roberts 588 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
1982), affirmed on remand
State v. Minor 580 So. 2d 975 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Greer 553 So. 2d 892 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Kanupp 552 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. James 545 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
1982), affirmed on remand
State v. Foster 541 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
affirmed on remand, 446 3o.2d 1210 (La.1984)
State v. Drummer 537 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
in which sentences were reversed for first offenders who admitted prior drug involvement.
State v. Michaels 516 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
1982), affirmed on remand
State v. Price 517 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
[State v. ] Jones [ ], supra; ” The record before us reflects that the trial judge scrupulously complied with the statutory guidelines of Article 894.1, mentioning, in his written reasons for sentencing, each of the eleven mitigating factors in Section B of Article 894.1.
State v. Bunch 510 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
1982), affirmed on remand
State v. Freeman 503 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Gray 502 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Brazell 499 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Shelton 490 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Dondis 467 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Williams 467 So. 2d 1293 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Hayes 466 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Santee 464 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Guerra 450 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
potential for rehabilitation.’ see also
State v. Remedies 438 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
potential for rehabilitation.’ see also
State v. Cotten 438 So. 2d 1156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Quebedeaux 424 So. 2d 1009 La. 1982
State v. Ray 423 So. 2d 1116 La. 1982
State v. Keeney 422 So. 2d 1144 La. 1982
State v. Knox 425 So. 2d 707 La. 1982
State v. Age 417 So. 2d 1183 La. 1982
State v. Bing 410 So. 2d 227 La. 1982
State v. Sepulvado, supra.
State v. Cupit 408 So. 2d 1108 La. 1981
potential for rehabilitation," but that it also greatly overestimated the significance of those factors weighing in favor of incarceration.
State v. Ezernack 408 So. 2d 907 La. 1981
State v. Kersey 406 So. 2d 555 La. 1981
State v. Dunns 404 So. 2d 1235 La. 1981