DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Carey, 392 So. 2d 443.

17 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Brenda Langlinais La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    “It holds no promise and serves no -9- purpose if the conditions are so harsh that the probationer is destined for failure at the outset.”
  • State v. Langlinais 27 So. 3d 1011 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    “It holds no promise and serves no | mpurpose if the conditions are so harsh that the probationer is destined for failure at the outset.”
  • State v. Kennedy 963 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Stephenson, 32,931 (La.App.2d Cir.3/10/00), , writ denied, 2000-1239 (La.2/9/01), .
  • State v. Hilbun 821 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Hall 775 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Stephenson 755 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    (wherein the supreme court set aside a sentence that included restitution payments of $50 per week as 13“unsupportable” in light of defendant’s monthly income of only $528).
  • State v. Stephenson 706 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Jones 628 So. 2d 1340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    2064 , 76 L.Ed.2d 221 (1983) holding that the trial court may not revoke a defendant’s probation and sentence the party to jail if the defendant is indigent without first considering other alternatives to incarceration.
  • State v. Duncan 604 So. 2d 1317 La. 1992
  • State v. Duncan 604 So. 2d 1317 La. 1992
  • State v. Sartain 571 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Pashandi 490 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    the defendant was convicted of receiving welfare benefits and services to which she was not entitled.
  • State v. Spell 461 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Knox 450 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    *380 appears to be ample justification for the trial court’s feeling that an insupportable restitution arrangement under a probated sentence was not acceptable.
  • State ex rel. Sterling 441 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • Goins v. Goins 437 So. 2d 947 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    While recognizing that the purpose of probation in criminal cases is to promote the defendant's rehabilitation by allowing him or her to reintegrate into society [ (La.
  • State v. Labure 427 So. 2d 855 La. 1983