DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Mattheson, 407 So. 2d 1150.

61 citing documents.

  • State v. Tassin 129 So. 3d 1235 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
  • State v. Frank 957 So. 2d 724 La. 2007
    1982)(rev'd); (aff'd); (La.
  • State v. Clark 851 So. 2d 1055 La. 2003
    State v. Roy, 95-0638 (La.10/04/96), ; cert.
  • State v. Taylor 838 So. 2d 729 La. 2003
    Id.; ("[when] the element of intent is regarded as an essential ingredient of the crime charged, it is proper to admit proof of similar but disconnected crimes to show the intent with which the act was committed."); -1160 (La.1981)(admission of evidence in first degree murder case, which related to armed robberies that took place after the murder and were part of one continuous transaction, which was relevant to negate the defense that defendant was intoxicated and that such condition precluded
  • State v. MM 802 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    [22] Id; State v. Mattheson
  • State v. M.M. 802 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Haddad 767 So. 2d 682 La. 2000
    2888 , 101 L.Ed.2d 923 (1988); cert.
  • State v. Hampton 750 So. 2d 867 La. 1999
    515 , 78 L.Ed.2d 702 (1983)(Jefferson Parish); cert.
  • State v. Cooks 720 So. 2d 637 La. 1998
    515 , 78 L.Ed.2d 702 (1983)(Jefferson Parish); cert.
  • State v. Tyler 723 So. 2d 939 La. 1998
    261 , 78 L.Ed.2d 246 ; cert.
  • State v. Williams 708 So. 2d 703 La. 1998
    263 , 78 L.Ed.2d 247 (1983)
  • State v. Strickland 683 So. 2d 218 La. 1996
  • State v. Hingle 677 So. 2d 603 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Valdetero 648 So. 2d 1048 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    In its brief to this Court, -1161 (La.1981), cert.
  • State v. Sanders 648 So. 2d 1272 La. 1994
    844 , 83 L.Ed.2d 841 (1985), and on this court's decisions which in turn rely on the Supreme Court's decisions, see, -07 (La.1988); disqualified them.
  • State v. Howard 649 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Corley 617 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Johnson 558 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Cage 554 So. 2d 39 La. 1989
    468 , 74 L.Ed.2d 617 (1982); (rem'd for resentencing); cert.
  • State v. Deboue 552 So. 2d 355 La. 1989
    1330 , 79 L.Ed.2d 725 (1984)
  • State v. Messiah 538 So. 2d 175 La. 1988
  • State v. Eaton 524 So. 2d 1194 La. 1988
  • State v. Thompson 516 So. 2d 349 La. 1987
    468 , 74 L.Ed.2d 617 (1982); cert.
  • State v. Kyles 513 So. 2d 265 La. 1987
    683 , 4 L.Ed.2d 668 (1960), upholding a warrantless search of a wastepaper basket in a hotel room, after the lodger had paid the bill and vacated the premises, because the seized items had been abandoned; upholding the seizure of items from the garbage can in the restroom of a restaurant as abandoned property.
  • State v. Harris 510 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    Although defendant concedes that the Louisiana Supreme Court has rejected a cert.
  • State v. Rowell 505 So. 2d 978 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Thomas 504 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Bates 495 So. 2d 1262 La. 1986
  • State v. Lombard 486 So. 2d 106 La. 1986
  • State v. Ford 489 So. 2d 1250 La. 1986
    State *1263 v. Mattheson, -62 (La.
  • State v. Lowenfield 495 So. 2d 1245 La. 1986
  • State v. Ward 483 So. 2d 578 La. 1986
  • State v. Jones 474 So. 2d 919 La. 1985
    3553 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1399 (1983); cert.
  • State v. Lombard 471 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    de that the potential harm to the administration of criminal justice which is involved in any inquiry into the grant of use immunity to a witness so far outweighs any possible need for such a procedure to ensure fair trials, that I would prohibit the district court from entertaining such an application or conducting such an inquiry.” In 1981, the Supreme Court of Louisiana, , considered a request for defense use immunity by Howard Mattheson, who wanted to call his wife in a prosecution for first
  • State v. Wilson 467 So. 2d 503 La. 1985
  • State v. Butler 462 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Nelson 459 So. 2d 510 La. 1984
  • State v. Carlisle 458 So. 2d 1347 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Wingo 457 So. 2d 1159 La. 1984
  • State v. Birdsong 452 So. 2d 1236 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    U.S. Cert denied, ___ U.S. ___, 103 S.Ct.
  • State v. Jackson 450 So. 2d 621 La. 1984
  • State v. Rivers 444 So. 2d 1384 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    1980); State v. Brumfield, supra
  • State v. Rault 445 So. 2d 1203 La. 1984
    *1216 held it was not error for the state to introduce evidence of defendant's prior convictions at the sentencing hearing without proof by the state that the defendant had been represented by counsel or had waived his right to such representation.
  • State v. Celestine 443 So. 2d 1091 La. 1983
  • Sawyer v. State 442 So. 2d 1136 La. 1983
  • State v. Wade 442 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Jordan 440 So. 2d 716 La. 1983
    wherein we stated: Nor do we find any merit in defendant's related argument that the trial judge erred in permitting introduction of the prior convictions without a showing by the state that defendant was represented by counsel or had waived same.
  • State v. Johnson 438 So. 2d 1091 La. 1983
  • State v. Flowers 441 So. 2d 707 La. 1983
  • State v. Berry 430 So. 2d 1005 La. 1983