Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. James, 396 So. 2d 1281.

46 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Jonathan L.citizen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Cox 26 So. 3d 929 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. Larry J. Julian, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Julian 25 So. 3d 253 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Bernard 26 So. 3d 181 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Williams 925 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
State v. Divers 889 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Graham 799 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Blanchard 749 So. 2d 19 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Zapata, supra ; State v. Becnel, 95-591 (La.App.
State v. Biglane 738 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Henderson 721 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
State v. Coleman, supra; State v. Davis, supra; State v. Harris, 28,517 (La.App.2d Cir.8/21/96), , writ denied 96-2954 (La.9/26/97), ; State v. Baker, 28,152 (La.App.2d Cir.5/08/96), , writ denied 96-1909 (La.12/06/96), ; State v. Thompson, 27,543 (La.App.2d Cir.12/06/95), ; State v.
State v. Zapata 713 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Fefie, 96-605 (La.
State v. Coleman 713 So. 2d 440 La. 1998
at 628 ; see also, ("Although in the present case the testimony was to the effect that the informer introduced [the agent] to the defendant and accompanied them when the defendant acquired the drugs and gave them to [the agent], these actions alone did not amount to participation in the offense of distribut[ion] or `sett
State v. Coleman 702 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
In brief, to support his assertion that, because CI-106’s identity was not revealed to him before trial, his constitutional right to confront and cross-examine his accusers during trial was violated.
State v. Fefie 692 So. 2d 1236 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
State v. Akins 687 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Baker 674 So. 2d 1108 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Thompson 665 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Thornton 671 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Carey 626 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Gantt 616 So. 2d 1300 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Dukes 609 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Bender 598 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
State v. Jones 587 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. DeMoss 582 So. 2d 964 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Christopher 561 So. 2d 935 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Hargrove 535 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
623 , 1 L.Ed.2d 639 (1957)
State v. Fontenot 524 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Smith 513 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. O'NEAL 501 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
623 , 1 L.Ed.2d 639 (1957)
State v. Martin 472 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Humphries 463 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
623 , 1 L.Ed.2d 639 (1957)
State v. Williams 458 So. 2d 1315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
at 627 ; Dotson, *1327 256 So.2d at 607 .
State v. Buffington 452 So. 2d 1313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Downing 451 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Williams 448 So. 2d 659 La. 1984
State v. Sweeney 443 So. 2d 522 La. 1983
State v. Kirkpatrick 443 So. 2d 546 La. 1983
State v. Williams 438 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Ester 436 So. 2d 543 La. 1983
State v. Knighton 436 So. 2d 1141 La. 1983
State v. Anthony 427 So. 2d 1155 La. 1983
State v. Hooks 421 So. 2d 880 La. 1983
State v. Ray 423 So. 2d 1116 La. 1982
State v. Statum, supra ; State v. Strickland, supra, at 1068 (Calogero, J. concurring).
State v. Arnaud 412 So. 2d 1013 La. 1982
State v. Davis 411 So. 2d 434 La. 1982
this court stated that the trial court is accorded great discretion in making the determination of whether or not to disclose the identity of a confidential informant.