Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Motton, 395 So. 2d 1337.
-
State v. Nolen
461 So. 2d 1073
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
certiorari denied at 454 U.S. 850 , 102 S.Ct.
-
State v. Sanford
465 So. 2d 4
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
” Aside from the defendant’s general allegation of perjury, he does not specifically allege how Trahan perjured himself.
- State v. Beckendorf 451 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
-
State v. Pettaway
450 So. 2d 1345
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Huizar, supra; La.C.Cr.P.
- State v. Jackson 450 So. 2d 621 La. 1984
- State v. Adams 446 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
- State v. Humphrey 445 So. 2d 1155 La. 1984
- State v. Bellows 442 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
- State v. Rodrigue 441 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Cobbs 434 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
-
State v. Hammonds
434 So. 2d 452
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); U.S. cert.
- State v. Williams 435 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
- State v. Knighton 436 So. 2d 1141 La. 1983
- State v. Smith 433 So. 2d 688 La. 1983
- State v. Moore 432 So. 2d 209 La. 1983
-
State v. Quebedeaux
424 So. 2d 1009
La. 1982
at 1350 (La.1981), we affirmed a trial court's denial of a motion for a new trial when the "witnesses could have been procured with the exercise of the slightest diligence."
- State v. Serrato 424 So. 2d 214 La. 1982
- State v. Tonubbee 420 So. 2d 126 La. 1982
- State v. Cobb 419 So. 2d 1237 La. 1982
- State v. Quimby 419 So. 2d 951 La. 1982
- State v. Huizar 414 So. 2d 741 La. 1982
- State v. Lane 414 So. 2d 1223 La. 1982
-
State v. Davis
411 So. 2d 2
La. 1982
Specific Intent was defined, as follows: "La.R.S.
- State v. Crawford 410 So. 2d 1076 La. 1982
- State v. Smith 408 So. 2d 1110 La. 1981
-
State v. Lindsey
404 So. 2d 466
La. 1981
on original hearing (La.1979)