Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hudson, 404 So. 2d 460.

16 citing documents.

  • State v. Hudson 245 So. 3d 277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
    A complete outline of the facts in this matter is found in the Louisiana Supreme Court opinion, State v. Hudson , (La.
  • State in the Interest of J.J.M. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    In that regard, n.7 (La.1981), noted: “If parents’ advice to tell the truth requires exclusion of 13 a juvenile’s confession, then virtually no guilty juvenile will ever be convicted on a confession given after consultation with parents.” There is also no absolute requiremen
  • State ex rel. J.J.M. 207 So. 3d 609 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    In that regard, n.7 (La.1981), noted: “If parents’ advice to tell the truth requires exclusion of jua juvenile’s confession, then virtually no guilty juvenile will ever be convicted on a confession given after consultation with parents.” There is also no absolute requirement that a parent be present during a juvenile suspect’s
  • State in the Interest of J.E. T. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • State ex rel. J.E.T. 10 So. 3d 1264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State Ex Rel. Jet 10 So. 3d 1264 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Cambre 902 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    the sixteen year old defendant argued that his parents lacked authority to consent to a search of his pants, which were in a pile of dirty clothes in his bedroom that he shared with his brothers.
  • State v. Hundley 760 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
  • State ex rel. D.L.S. 706 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Watkins 621 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • State v. Carter 569 So. 2d 1025 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
    [2] It is clear that Dino established a more stringent standard for admissibility of a however, we note that the requirements of Dino necessitate a careful review of the facts of each case.
  • State v. Belton 525 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Edwards 434 So. 2d 395 La. 1983
    2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); (La.
  • State v. Smith 431 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Rebstock 418 So. 2d 1306 La. 1982
    where the juvenile signed a waiver of his rights.
  • State in Interest of Francois 411 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982