DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Tauzier, 397 So. 2d 494.

25 citing documents.

  • State v. McElveen 73 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    The trial court would have had to instruct the jury that under Louisiana law, the prosecution has the burden of establishing only “that it is more probable than not that the evidence is connected with the offense.”
  • State of Louisiana v. Leon D. Fussell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    ANN. art. 230.1(D); cf. LA.CODE CRIM.
  • State v. Fussell 941 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    ANN. art. 230.1(D); cf. LA.CODE CRIM.
  • State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
    ANN. art. 230.1(D); cf. LA.CODE CRIM.
  • State v. Borne 691 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
  • State v. Bouie 598 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
  • State v. Leonard 543 So. 2d 975 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Wilson 520 So. 2d 935 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Mims 505 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Burns 504 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    and (3) it is established that there is an inconsistency between the officer's testimony at trial and his report.
  • State v. Shropshire 471 So. 2d 707 La. 1985
    State v. Square, 257 La.
  • State v. Green 469 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Simms 465 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Trahan 463 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    and (3) it is established that there is an inconsistency between the officer’s testimony at trial and his report.
  • State v. Sanford 465 So. 2d 4 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    the Court stated: “For demonstrative evidence to be admissible at trial, the State has the burden of establishing that it is more probable than not that the evidence is connected with the offense.
  • State v. Bosley 454 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Gabriel 450 So. 2d 611 La. 1984
    at 502 (La.1981); at 520 (La.1978).
  • State v. Wright 441 So. 2d 1301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    1st Cir.1983), writ denied
  • State v. Anderson 440 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Clay 441 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Johnson 438 So. 2d 1091 La. 1983
    State v. Simpson, 259 La.
  • State v. Mosley 425 So. 2d 764 La. 1983
  • State v. Cobb 419 So. 2d 1237 La. 1982
  • State v. Moore 419 So. 2d 963 La. 1982
  • State v. Latin 412 So. 2d 1357 La. 1982
    and (3) it is established that there is an inconsistency between the officer's testimony at trial and his report.