Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Tompkins, 403 So. 2d 644.

130 citing documents.

State v. Robinson 820 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Deal 802 So. 2d 1254 La. 2001
State v. Holley 799 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
State v. Bloodworth 790 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Jackson 774 So. 2d 1046 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Arnold, 30,282 (La.
State v. Callegari 773 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Judge 758 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
State v. Ruffins 748 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Ruffins 748 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Armstrong 743 So. 2d 284 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Snyder 750 So. 2d 832 La. 1999
State v. Bernard 734 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
State v. Colomb 720 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Shanks 715 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Riley, 91-2132, p. 10 (La.App.
State v. Pickney 714 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State v. Hardy 711 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State v. Harris 708 So. 2d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Arvie 709 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State v. Thames 681 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Riley, 91-2132R, p. 10 (La.App.
State v. Thompson 665 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Fenner 664 So. 2d 1315 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Therefore, pursuant to the Louisiana Supreme Court's logic as expressed in footnote 4 a higher level of criminal intent cannot be a defense to a charge of negligent homicide: Moreover, R.S.
State v. Henry 663 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
State v. Williams 658 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Richard 657 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Accordingly, the Louisiana Supreme Court stated, "The choice not to believe defendant was one based on the resolution of conflicting testimony, and that choice cannot be upset by this court on the basis that the conflicting version constituted insufficient evidence."
State v. Perkins 652 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
State v. Brumfield 639 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Riley 637 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Clark 638 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State v. Straughter 630 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
State v. Pipkins 628 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Hongo 625 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
appeal after remand (La.
State v. Johnson 613 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
appeal after remand (La.App.
State v. Williams 606 So. 2d 1387 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Myers 583 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Nugent 580 So. 2d 1002 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
9 Since they are mitigatory factors, a defendant who establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that he acted in a `sudden passion' or `heat of blood' is entitled to a manslaughter verdict.10 Where such proof has been i
State Ex Rel. Lawrence v. Smith 571 So. 2d 133 La. 1990
State v. Hudson 570 So. 2d 504 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
State v. Dietrich 567 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Dozier 553 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Lloyd 535 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Ealy 530 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Gibson 529 So. 2d 1347 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Theard 527 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Quinn 526 So. 2d 322 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Maddox 522 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Gaines 508 So. 2d 1017 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Babineaux 508 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Ruff 504 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Montgomery 499 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
(footnote no. 9); Brumfield, 329 So.2d at 189 .
State v. Landry 499 So. 2d 1320 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986