Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jones, 398 So. 2d 1049.

1074 citing documents.

State v. Fultz 591 So. 2d 1308 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
for a listing of the important elements in that review.
State v. Jones 591 So. 2d 1311 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Tucker 591 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
for a listing of the important elements in that review.
State v. Wyatt 591 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Wry 591 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Baird 592 So. 2d 815 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Rubin 588 So. 2d 1289 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Lobato 588 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Spates 588 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Jones 588 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Conway 588 So. 2d 1369 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Roberts 588 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
1982), affirmed on remand
State v. Miller 587 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Riley 587 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Palinkas 587 So. 2d 27 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Otis 586 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Williams 587 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
the Louisiana Supreme Court said, “[m]aximum sentences are appropriately imposed in cases involving the most serious violations of the described offense, and for the worst kind of offender.” After reviewing the record, the circumstances of the offense, and the considerations articulated by the trial judge w
State v. Minor 580 So. 2d 975 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Camp 580 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
State v. Moore 575 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Johnson 575 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Edwards 575 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Smith 576 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Munoz 575 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
App. 3rd Cir.1986) and cases cited therein
State v. Walker 573 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Calton 573 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Flowers 574 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Anderson 574 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Coleman 574 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Allen 571 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Waldrop 571 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Boyte 571 So. 2d 722 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Bishop 571 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
The trial judge stated a thorough factual background on the record; he ordered and reviewed a presentence investigation report ("PSI"); and he carefully discussed both the general guidelines of art. 894.1A and the "important elements" (La.App.
State v. Carter 570 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
State v. Cathey 569 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Ashley 569 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Crabtree 569 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Perez 569 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Lard 568 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Hunt 568 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Kidd 568 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Winston 567 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Lewis 566 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Miller 566 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Shepherd 566 So. 2d 1127 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Lamb 566 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Wilson 561 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Harris 561 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Coats 561 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Johnson 561 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990