DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jones, 398 So. 2d 1049.

1074 citing documents.

  • State v. Price 527 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Restrepo 527 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Walker 530 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Lofton 528 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Robinson 525 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Hahn 526 So. 2d 260 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Joseph 524 So. 2d 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Legendre 522 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Phelps 520 So. 2d 1299 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
    State v. Jones, [ ] supra.
  • State v. Smith 520 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Smith 524 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Hudgins 519 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Martin 520 So. 2d 1079 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    State v. Quebedeaux, supra
  • State v. Michaels 516 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
    1982), affirmed on remand
  • State v. Stevenson 514 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Brantley 514 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Deters 517 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Price 517 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    [State v. ] Jones [ ], supra; ” The record before us reflects that the trial judge scrupulously complied with the statutory guidelines of Article 894.1, mentioning, in his written reasons for sentencing, each of the eleven mitigating factors in
  • State v. Lynch 512 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
    State v. Jones [ ], supra.
  • State v. Herrington 512 So. 2d 607 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Robinson 511 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Bunch 510 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
    1982), affirmed on remand
  • State v. Champagne 506 So. 2d 1377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Shrout 505 So. 2d 253 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Rochefort 504 So. 2d 1116 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
    State v. Jones [ ], supra.
  • State v. Scott 503 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated “Maximum sentences are appropriately imposed in cases involving the most serious violations of the described offense, and for the worst kind of offender.
  • State v. Gilbert 503 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Freeman 503 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Darby 502 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Joseph 502 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Roye 501 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Gray 502 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Broussard 498 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    ...” In the present case, the defendant admits having a prior felony record, but argues that his successful completion of two years of supervised probation in 1983 should mitigate in his favor.
  • State v. Davis 499 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    The courts have vacated a 21-year sentence for distribution of cocaine, a five-year sentence for attempted distribution of marijuana, and a three-year sentence for possession of preludin with intent to distribute
  • State v. Wilder 499 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Cottingin 496 So. 2d 1379 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Rodriguez 499 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Davis 496 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    State v. Jones, [ ] supra.
  • State v. Dew 495 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Tzuanos 491 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Celestine 493 So. 2d 169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Shelton 490 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Penny 486 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • Hoffman v. Hoffman 480 So. 2d 1031 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Thrasher 480 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    “Maximum sentences are appropriately imposed in cases involving the most serious violations of the described offense, and for the worse kind of offender.
  • State v. Allen 478 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    This court noted that "we are mindful of the principle that ordinarily maximum sentences are appropriately imposed in cases involving the most serious violations of the described offenses and for the worst kind of offender; nothing else will justify the great sentencing discretion given the trial judge,"
  • State v. Johnston 476 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    State v. Davis, supra ; State v. Soco, supra ; (La.
  • State v. Leason 477 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Buie 477 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Hanner 476 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    495 , 30 L.Ed.2d 427 (1971)