Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brown, 398 So. 2d 1381.

31 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Melanie Barnett Curtin La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Evelyn Clanton La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
Motive is the cause or reason that moves the will and induces action for definite result.”
State of Louisiana v. Joshua D. Sant La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Furthermore, the supreme court stated: These facts, circumstances and inferences from them, if unexplained, would establish that this defendant was told to commit the crime and acted upon this communication by taking the gun from Williams, sticking it out the window of the car
State v. Sant 268 So. 3d 1102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Furthermore, in State v. Brown , , 1386 (La.1981), the supreme court stated: These facts, circumstances and inferences from them, if unexplained, would establish that this defendant was told to commit the crime and acted upon this communication by taking the gun from Williams, sticking it out the window of the car, pointing it at the officer, and uns
State v. Sandifer 249 So. 3d 142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1982) (observing that "[a] criminal conspiracy to commit a crime is an inchoate crime separate and distinct from the completed criminal act") (citing State v. Brown , (La.
State v. Passaniti 144 So. 3d 1220 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Interest of WTB 771 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Ellis 657 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
State v. Lankford 626 So. 2d 1217 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
900 , 66 L.Ed.2d 830 (1981); State v. Perez, supra; (La.App.
State v. Parker 625 So. 2d 1364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Daniels 607 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Lobato 588 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. McCain 583 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Perez 569 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Driggers 554 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
the defendant complained that the fact he was driving a stolen automobile at the time of the offense was inadmissible as evidence of another crime.
State v. Simmons 518 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Hereford 518 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
the court held evidence that the car which defendant was driving was stolen in an attempted murder trial was admissible.
State v. Willis 510 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Stringer 496 So. 2d 1287 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Koll 463 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Ester 458 So. 2d 1357 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State *1366 v. Brown, reh.
State v. Bennett 454 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Hughes v. Department of Public Safety, Office of State Police 453 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Holmes 451 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Stewart 452 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Robertson 441 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Moreover, the Louisiana Supreme Court said that "the probative value of the crime of car theft for the purpose of establishing motive outweighed the prejudicial effect" on the defendant before the jury in a prosecution for attempted first-degree murder of a deputy sheriff.
State v. Johnson 438 So. 2d 1091 La. 1983
State v. Smith 433 So. 2d 688 La. 1983
* * * * * * in urging that the trial court denied improperly his motion for a mistrial.
State v. Davis 430 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Richards 426 So. 2d 1314 La. 1982
State v. Humphrey 412 So. 2d 507 La. 1982