Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Austin, 399 So. 2d 158.
- State v. Childers 463 So. 2d 1010 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- State v. Daley 463 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
- State v. Landry 463 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
- State v. Aitch 465 So. 2d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
-
State v. Bessard
461 So. 2d 1201
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
- State v. Bailey 457 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
- State v. Latiolais 453 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
- State v. Porter 454 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
- State v. Moran 451 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
- State v. Wright 445 So. 2d 1198 La. 1984
-
State v. Rault
445 So. 2d 1203
La. 1984
15:438; State v. Graham, supra; State v. Moore, supra
- State v. Lathers 444 So. 2d 96 La. 1983
- State v. Howard 441 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Johnson 440 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
- State v. Buchanan 439 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Johnson 438 So. 2d 1091 La. 1983
- State v. Jacobs 435 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
-
State v. Norman
434 So. 2d 1291
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
attempted to set forth a single standard of review to be exercised in cases such as this, when a claim is made that the circumstantial evidence presented is insufficient to sustain a conviction [3] .
-
State v. Chism
436 So. 2d 464
La. 1983
State v. Moore, supra (Marcus, J. concurring); State v. Shapiro, supra (Marcus and Lemmon, JJ.
- State v. Hammonds 434 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
-
State v. Williams
435 So. 2d 1047
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), this court must determine whether any reasonable trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty of attempted first degree murder of Captain Ory by accepting the facts or evidence most favorable to the prosecution.
- State v. Dixon 432 So. 2d 1025 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Allen 431 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
- State v. Shapiro 431 So. 2d 372 La. 1983
- State v. Oliney 430 So. 2d 1294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Jessie 429 So. 2d 859 La. 1983
- State v. Moore 432 So. 2d 209 La. 1983
- State v. White 430 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
- State v. White 430 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
- State v. Small 427 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
- State v. Telsee 425 So. 2d 1251 La. 1983
- State v. Sims 426 So. 2d 148 La. 1983
- State v. Ruple 426 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
-
State v. Parker
425 So. 2d 683
La. 1982
Correlating this rule relative to circumstantial evidence with Jackson v. Virginia , that: "when we review a conviction based upon circumstantial evidence we must determine that, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, a rational trier of fact could have concluded beyond a reasonable doubt that every reasonable hypothesis of innocence had been excluded."
- State v. Montana 421 So. 2d 895 La. 1982
- State v. Washington 421 So. 2d 887 La. 1982
- State v. Narcisse 420 So. 2d 947 La. 1982
- State v. Graham 422 So. 2d 123 La. 1982
- State v. Jackson 419 So. 2d 837 La. 1982
-
State v. Hollie
416 So. 2d 542
La. 1982
: when we review a conviction based upon circumstantial evidence we must determine that, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, a rational trier of fact could have concluded beyond a reasonable doubt that every reasonable hypothesis of innocence had been excluded.
- State v. Buxton 416 So. 2d 71 La. 1982
-
State v. Brown
414 So. 2d 689
La. 1982
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
- State v. Morris 414 So. 2d 320 La. 1982
- State v. Ennis 414 So. 2d 661 La. 1982
-
State v. Lewis
412 So. 2d 1353
La. 1982
a twenty-five year sentence for forcible rape was affirmed by this court for a crime that displayed far less viciousness.
- State v. Humphrey 412 So. 2d 507 La. 1982
-
State v. Bindom
410 So. 2d 749
La. 1982
This court definitively enunciated the Jackson standard of review in a : "Regarding circumstantial evidence, R.S.
-
State v. Kersey
406 So. 2d 555
La. 1981
This Court has recently addressed the question of the sufficiency of evidence necessary to support a and held that under Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
-
State v. Edwards
400 So. 2d 1370
La. 1981
Correlating this rule relative to circumstantial evidence with Jackson v. Virginia , that: "when we review a conviction based upon circumstantial evidence we must determine that, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, a rational trier of fact could have concluded beyond a reasonable doubt that every reasonable hypothesis of innocence had been excluded."