Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Austin, 399 So. 2d 158.

99 citing documents.

  • State v. Childers 463 So. 2d 1010 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Daley 463 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Landry 463 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Aitch 465 So. 2d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Bessard 461 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Bailey 457 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Latiolais 453 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Porter 454 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Moran 451 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Wright 445 So. 2d 1198 La. 1984
  • State v. Rault 445 So. 2d 1203 La. 1984
    15:438; State v. Graham, supra; State v. Moore, supra
  • State v. Lathers 444 So. 2d 96 La. 1983
  • State v. Howard 441 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Johnson 440 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Buchanan 439 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Johnson 438 So. 2d 1091 La. 1983
  • State v. Jacobs 435 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Norman 434 So. 2d 1291 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    attempted to set forth a single standard of review to be exercised in cases such as this, when a claim is made that the circumstantial evidence presented is insufficient to sustain a conviction [3] .
  • State v. Chism 436 So. 2d 464 La. 1983
    State v. Moore, supra (Marcus, J. concurring); State v. Shapiro, supra (Marcus and Lemmon, JJ.
  • State v. Hammonds 434 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Williams 435 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), this court must determine whether any reasonable trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty of attempted first degree murder of Captain Ory by accepting the facts or evidence most favorable to the prosecution.
  • State v. Dixon 432 So. 2d 1025 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Allen 431 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
  • State v. Shapiro 431 So. 2d 372 La. 1983
  • State v. Oliney 430 So. 2d 1294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Jessie 429 So. 2d 859 La. 1983
  • State v. Moore 432 So. 2d 209 La. 1983
  • State v. White 430 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • State v. White 430 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Small 427 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Telsee 425 So. 2d 1251 La. 1983
  • State v. Sims 426 So. 2d 148 La. 1983
  • State v. Ruple 426 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Parker 425 So. 2d 683 La. 1982
    Correlating this rule relative to circumstantial evidence with Jackson v. Virginia , that: "when we review a conviction based upon circumstantial evidence we must determine that, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, a rational trier of fact could have concluded beyond a reasonable doubt that every reasonable hypothesis of innocence had been excluded."
  • State v. Montana 421 So. 2d 895 La. 1982
  • State v. Washington 421 So. 2d 887 La. 1982
  • State v. Narcisse 420 So. 2d 947 La. 1982
  • State v. Graham 422 So. 2d 123 La. 1982
  • State v. Jackson 419 So. 2d 837 La. 1982
  • State v. Hollie 416 So. 2d 542 La. 1982
    : when we review a conviction based upon circumstantial evidence we must determine that, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, a rational trier of fact could have concluded beyond a reasonable doubt that every reasonable hypothesis of innocence had been excluded.
  • State v. Buxton 416 So. 2d 71 La. 1982
  • State v. Brown 414 So. 2d 689 La. 1982
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Morris 414 So. 2d 320 La. 1982
  • State v. Ennis 414 So. 2d 661 La. 1982
  • State v. Lewis 412 So. 2d 1353 La. 1982
    a twenty-five year sentence for forcible rape was affirmed by this court for a crime that displayed far less viciousness.
  • State v. Humphrey 412 So. 2d 507 La. 1982
  • State v. Bindom 410 So. 2d 749 La. 1982
    This court definitively enunciated the Jackson standard of review in a : "Regarding circumstantial evidence, R.S.
  • State v. Kersey 406 So. 2d 555 La. 1981
    This Court has recently addressed the question of the sufficiency of evidence necessary to support a and held that under Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Edwards 400 So. 2d 1370 La. 1981
    Correlating this rule relative to circumstantial evidence with Jackson v. Virginia , that: "when we review a conviction based upon circumstantial evidence we must determine that, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, a rational trier of fact could have concluded beyond a reasonable doubt that every reasonable hypothesis of innocence had been excluded."