Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Prestridge, 399 So. 2d 564.

273 citing documents.

Phillip Allen Wilson v. Liz Murrill, in her capacity as The Attorney General of The State of Louisiana,et … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2026
State of Louisiana v. Gary Allen La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
The district court has “wide discretion in controlling the scope of [closing] argument.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Tyrone A. Stewart La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. James Derek Person, II La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
115, 74 L.Ed.2d 101 (1982)
State of Louisiana v. Darren Bridges La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Ezra J. Coutee, II La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State Of Louisiana v. Kerry Alexander La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
In support of his assertion, - 78 ( La.
State of Louisiana v. Antoine Edwards La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
App. 1 Cir. 4/24/15), ( (La.
State of Louisiana v. Freddy Lee Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Shane Christian Pagano La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Randall Paul Burton La. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Ronald St. Cyre La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State Of Louisiana v. Nathan Curry La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. McIntosh 275 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Folse 258 So. 3d 53 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 1st Cir. 4/24/15), , 1063 ; State v. Prestridge , , 580 (La.
State v. Folse 258 So. 3d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 1st Cir. 4/24/15), , 1063 ; State v. Prestridge , , 580 (La.
State v. Howard 258 So. 3d 66 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
See State v. Prestridge , , 579-80 (La.
State v. Brazell 245 So. 3d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Casey , 99-0023, p. 17, 775 So.2d at 1036 (citing State v. Prestridge , , 580 (La.
State v. Nixon 250 So. 3d 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 1st Cir. 4/24/15), , 1063 ; State v. Prestridge , , 580 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Jermaine Christopher Obrien AKA Jermaine Christopher O'Brien La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Obrien 242 So. 3d 1254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Raine 238 So. 3d 1076 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Prestridge , , 580 (La.
State v. Handy 226 So. 3d 1182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Lee 217 So. 3d 1266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Leo Paul Thibodeaux, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Thibodeaux 216 So. 3d 73 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Daniel Brandon Prince -Aka- Daniel B. Prince La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
115, 74 L.Ed.2d 101 (1982)
State v. Prince 211 So. 3d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
115 , 74 L.Ed.2d 101 (1982); (La.
State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark 220 So. 3d 583 La. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Marcus Donte Reed 200 So. 3d 291 La. 2016
State v. Franklin 198 So. 3d 1222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Lambert 186 So. 3d 728 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Alfred Mayo La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State v. Mayo 165 So. 3d 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Vansant 170 So. 3d 1059 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Draughn, 950 So.2d at 614 .
State v. Mills 153 So. 3d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Cushenberry 146 So. 3d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
” Draughn , at p. 44, 950 So.2d at 614 .
State v. Wallace 143 So. 3d 1275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State *1281 v. Prestridge
State of Louisiana v. Alcide Hypolite La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Hypolite 139 So. 3d 687 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Haynes 144 So. 3d 1083 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Hampton 136 So. 3d 240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
“[A] trial judge has broad discretion in controlling the scope of the closing argument.” State v. Draughn, 05-1825, p. 44 (La.1/17/07), ().
State v. Sippio 133 So. 3d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Draughn, 2005-1825, p. 44 (La.1/17/07), ; (a trial judge has broad discretion in controlling the scope of closing argument).
State v. Celestine 131 So. 3d 947 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
” Draughn, 950 So.2d at 614 .
State v. Norah 131 So. 3d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“A trial judge has broad discretion in controlling the scope of the closing argument,” Drau ghn, 05-1825 at p. 44, 950 So.2d at 614 (), see also State v. Casey, 99-0023, p. 17 (La.1/26/00), , and prosecutors are granted wide latitude in choosing their closing argument tactics.
State v. Augustine 131 So. 3d 109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
” Draughn , at p. 44, 950 So.2d at 614 .
State v. Kiger 128 So. 3d 552 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
State v. Allen 126 So. 3d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Casey , 99-0023, p. 17, 775 So.2d at 1036 .
State v. Hollins 123 So. 3d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Lawrence 120 So. 3d 812 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013