DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. White, 399 So. 2d 172.

35 citing documents.

  • State Of Louisiana v. Kari Shisler & Joseph Dyczewski La. 2020
    205, 98 L.Ed.2d 156 (1987); State v. White , –176 (La.
  • State Of Louisiana v. Kari Shisler & Joseph Dyczewski La. 2020
    205, 98 L.Ed.2d 156 (1987); State v. White , –176 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Malveaux, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    Warrants therefore are generally required to search an individual’s home or person, “unless ‘the exigencies of the situation’ make the needs of law enforcement so compelling that the warrantless search is objectively reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.”
  • State v. Malveaux 245 So. 3d 81 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    State v. White , , 175 (La.1981).
  • State v. Cooper 223 So. 3d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    Warrants therefore are generally required to search an individual’s home or person, “unless” the exigencies of the situation’ make the needs of law enforcement so compelling that the warrantless search is objectively reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.”
  • State v. Lundy 195 So. 3d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    w[as] not so great as to vitiate the free and voluntary nature of his statements.”
  • State v. Summers 170 So. 3d 960 La. 2015
    Also, while a warrant is generally required to search a home or its curtilage, “the exigencies of the situation” can “make the needs of law enforcement so compelling that the warrantless search is objectively reasonable under the Fourth Amendment” State v. Lee, 05-2098, pp. 14-15 (La.1/16/08)
  • State v. Lilly 111 So. 3d 45 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Ann. art. 774; (case concerned crime of manslaughter, which carried a penalty of imprisonment at hard labor for not more than forty years).
  • State v. Lee 976 So. 2d 109 La. 2008
  • State v. Warren 949 So. 2d 1215 La. 2007
  • State v. Divers 889 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Daniels 614 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Carouthers 607 So. 2d 1018 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Brown 598 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
  • State v. Swayze 554 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Mullins 537 So. 2d 386 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Copeland 530 So. 2d 526 La. 1988
  • State v. Narcisse 512 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Robinson 490 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Byrne 483 So. 2d 564 La. 1986
  • State v. Hartman 479 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Thomas 470 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Murphy 465 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    Mincey v. Arizona, supra
  • State v. Patterson 464 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    ” While in custody at the Kenner Police Department, the defendant made additional statements which were admitted into evidence.
  • State v. Harrison 451 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Jackson 452 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    507 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967); Terry v. Ohio, supra
  • State v. Aspin 449 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Davis 448 So. 2d 645 La. 1984
  • State v. Thompson 448 So. 2d 666 La. 1984
    1727 , 18 L.Ed.2d 930 (1967)
  • State v. Westfall 446 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    where the inadmissible hearsay was the only information to that effect in the entire case and not "cumulative"; where the court held possible inadmissible inculpatory statement would constitute "harmless error" because more "self condemning" statements given prior to the questionable statement were properly admitted; (La.
  • State v. Doucet 443 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    the Court stated: " Miranda warnings are not a prerequisite to admissibility of statements taken by officers during non-custodial, general on-the-scene investigations, conducted to determine the facts and circumstances surrounding a possible crime, absent a showing that the investigation has passed the inve
  • State v. Turner 440 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Mitchell 437 So. 2d 264 La. 1983
  • State v. Ludwig 423 So. 2d 1073 La. 1982
    we approved a warrantless search made because of exigent circumstances.
  • State v. Johnson 407 So. 2d 673 La. 1981
    the Fourth Amendment does not bar police officers from making warrantless entries and searches when they reasonably believe that a person within is in need of immediate aid.