Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lockwood, 399 So. 2d 190.

47 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Allen James Harrison La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. John Wesley Billiot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Billiot 135 So. 3d 1257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State of Louisiana v. Shane Welch La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Likewise, the defendant contended his counsel was led to believe he would receive a
State of Louisiana v. Darryl Boudreaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Boudreaux 11 So. 3d 1190 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. Melvin Sigue La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Sigue 940 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State of Louisiana v. Roy D. Roe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Roe 903 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Wood 793 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Blanchard 786 So. 2d 701 La. 2001
State v. Moree 772 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Walton 738 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
State v. Bernard 702 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
State v. Rios 670 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
495 , 30 L.Ed.2d 427 (1971); appeal after remand, (La.App.
State v. Readoux 614 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Haislip 606 So. 2d 1314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
495 , 30 L.Ed.2d 427 (1971)
State v. Greer 572 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Jones 546 So. 2d 1343 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Johnson 533 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Davis 528 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
2d 118 (La.1979); appeal after remand (La.App.
State v. Picchini 508 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Celestine 493 So. 2d 169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Taylor 479 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Evans 475 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Lahrmann 475 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Atley 470 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Gay 463 So. 2d 70 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
495 , 30 L.Ed.2d 427 (1971)
State v. Willis 457 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Banks 457 So. 2d 1264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
1982), on rehearing, or the defendant given an opportunity to withdraw the plea
Distinguished State v. Cooper 449 So. 2d 1376 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Smith 449 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
However, another case, draws a distinction between a breached promise and a misunderstanding.
State v. Bosworth 451 So. 2d 1070 La. 1984
State v. Hiatt 444 So. 2d 248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Burris 443 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Brown 440 So. 2d 994 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Lockwood 439 So. 2d 394 La. 1983
State v. King 436 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Thomas 434 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
rehearing denied June 22, 1981.
Fleming v. State 431 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
A misunderstanding between counsel and defendant does not have the same implication as a breached plea bargain and does not render the guilty plea not “free and voluntary.”
State v. Hudson 429 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Buckenburger 428 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Indeed, in affirming the trial court's denial of a motion to withdraw a plea allegedly based on the defendant's misunderstanding of the terms of that agreement, the Supreme Court stated that there was no need to continue the sentencing "for an evidentiary hearing because there was no need for such a hearing on the
State v. Fergus 418 So. 2d 594 La. 1982
Prior to sentencing, appellants filed a motion to traverse the pre-sentence investigation report, and an evidentiary hearing was subsequently held, as required by State v. *598 Bosworth
State v. Bosworth 415 So. 2d 912 La. 1982
as authority for its position.
State v. Clark 414 So. 2d 369 La. 1982
art. 559), and a defendant has a right to withdraw the plea when a promise is made and then broken, (La.
State v. Thompson 414 So. 2d 1218 La. 1982