Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Klar, 400 So. 2d 610.
- State v. Hupp 514 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
- State v. Huddleston 517 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- State v. Matthews 517 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- State v. Reed 512 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- State v. Deal 511 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- State v. Babineaux 508 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
- State v. White 508 So. 2d 982 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
- State v. Matthieu 506 So. 2d 1209 La. 1987
- State v. Brown 507 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
- State v. DeBlieux 505 So. 2d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- State v. Thorne 503 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- State v. Olson 503 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- State v. McCullough 503 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- State v. Spooner 502 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- State v. Toussaint 502 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
- State v. Isom 499 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- State v. Sterling 496 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
-
State v. Jones
496 So. 2d 638
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
art. 802(3); and the jury's evaluation of credibility is not reviewable on appeal.
- State v. Farris 491 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
-
State v. Landry
488 So. 2d 458
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
3rd Cir.1984), writ denied
- State v. Alexander 487 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
- State v. Licciardi 483 So. 2d 1287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
-
State v. Franks
483 So. 2d 224
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
His factual determinations are entitled to great weight and will not be disturbed unless clearly contrary to the evidence.”
- State v. Gates 478 So. 2d 241 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- State v. Minnifield 475 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
- State v. Huntley 474 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- State v. Marcotte 471 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- State v. Williams 470 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
- State v. Bourg 470 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
- State v. Fairbanks 467 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
- State v. Cook 465 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
-
State v. Hoyt
464 So. 2d 841
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
and numerous other decisions.
- State v. Henry 461 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
- State v. Guillory 461 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
-
State v. Payne
461 So. 2d 1151
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Our review for minimal constitutional sufficiency of evidence is a limited one which ends upon our finding that the rational trier-reasonable doubt standard has been satisfied.” See also, (La.App.
- State v. Ring 461 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
- State v. Dill 461 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
- State v. Williams 457 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
- State v. Morgan 459 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Scott 454 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
- State v. Porter 454 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
- State v. Butler 450 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
- State v. Waterloo 447 So. 2d 561 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Smith 445 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
- State v. Stokes 441 So. 2d 1308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Williams 438 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
- State v. Harvin 437 So. 2d 983 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
- State v. Jacobs 435 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Hughes 436 So. 2d 677 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
- State v. Gray 436 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983