DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Petterway, 403 So. 2d 1157.

83 citing documents.

  • State v. Maiden 463 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    the deputy testified that he told the defendant that "things would go easier for him" if he cooperated.
  • State v. Counterman 461 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. James 459 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Shepherd 449 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Vessell 450 So. 2d 938 La. 1984
  • State v. Wilms 449 So. 2d 442 La. 1984
  • State v. Doucet 443 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Wright 441 So. 2d 1301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Lastrapes 443 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    the defendant was told by a deputy that the defendant would be better off if he cooperated.
  • State v. Lane 438 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    where an officer admitted that he had told defendant “that things would go easier for him if he cooperated.” In addressing that remark, the court stated as follows: “[Statements of this type, rather than being promises or inducements designed to extract a confession, are more likely musings not much beyond
  • State v. Hall 434 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • State Ex Rel. Johnson v. McGougan 433 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • Explained State v. Shapiro 431 So. 2d 372 La. 1983
  • State v. Odds 430 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Oliney 430 So. 2d 1294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Thus, the court observed: `Furthermore federal due process does not require a state in criminal cases or otherwise to provide an appellate system.
  • State v. Narcisse 426 So. 2d 118 La. 1983
    1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966)
  • State v. Ruple 426 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Thus, the court observed: "Furthermore federal due process does not require a state in criminal cases or otherwise to provide an appellate system.
  • State v. Serrato 424 So. 2d 214 La. 1982
  • State v. Taylor 422 So. 2d 109 La. 1982
  • State v. Jackson 414 So. 2d 310 La. 1982
  • State v. West 408 So. 2d 1302 La. 1982
  • State v. LeCompte 406 So. 2d 1300 La. 1981
    [*] Consistent with the procedures utilized by this court in assigning Court of Appeal Judges to sit as Justices Ad Hoc in criminal appeals (), applications for and consideration upon rehearing are entertained by the permanent court as was the case here.
  • State v. Wilkerson 403 So. 2d 652 La. 1981
    See the writer's dissent, State v. Petterway, La.1981, .
  • State v. McDonald 404 So. 2d 889 La. 1981
    See the writer's dissent, State v. Petterway, La.1981, .
  • State v. Morris 404 So. 2d 1186 La. 1981
  • State v. Woods 402 So. 2d 680 La. 1981
    See the writer's dissent, State v. Petterway, La.1981, .
  • State v. Hudgins 400 So. 2d 889 La. 1981
    See the writer's dissent, State v. Petterway, La.1981, .
  • State v. Meredith 400 So. 2d 580 La. 1981
    See the writer's dissent, State v. Petterway, La.1981, .
  • State v. Stewart 400 So. 2d 633 La. 1981
    See the writer's dissent, State v. Petterway, La.1981, .
  • State v. Hymer 400 So. 2d 637 La. 1981
    See the writer's dissent, State v. Petterway, La.1981, .
  • State v. Jones 400 So. 2d 658 La. 1981
    See the writer's dissent, State v. Petterway, La.1981, .
  • State v. Bias 400 So. 2d 650 La. 1981
    See the writer's dissent, State v. Petterway, La.1981, .
  • State v. Blanton 400 So. 2d 661 La. 1981
    See the writer's dissent, State v. Petterway, La.1981, .