DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Acliese, 403 So. 2d 665.

40 citing documents.

  • State v. Baskin 129 So. 3d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    the defendant was convicted of forcible rape of an 11-year-old girl.
  • State v. EO 980 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. E.O., Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Griffin 984 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Crochet, XXXX-XXXX at pp. 7-8, 931 So.2d at 1087 ( citing State v. Kennedy, XXXX-XXXX, pp. 6-7 (La.4/3/01), , 921 ); see also La C.E.
  • State v. Crochet 931 So. 2d 1083 La. 2006
    See State v. Kennedy, 00-1554, pp. 6-7 (La.4/3/01), ( that "evidence of prior sex crimes against the prosecuting victim is admissible under an exception to the general rule excluding evidence of other crimes similar to the charged offense").
  • State v. Morgan 830 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Maise 805 So. 2d 1141 La. 2002
    (Dixon, J., dissenting) (discussing [ State v. ] Moore [, ]).
  • State v. Mills 806 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Kennedy 803 So. 2d 916 La. 2001
    A so-called "lustful disposition exception" to the evidentiary prohibition of Article 404(B) in which we relied on our jurisprudence dating back to 1903 for the proposition that evidence of prior sex crimes against the prosecuting victim is admissible under an exception to the general rule excluding evidence of other crimes similar to the charged offense.
  • State v. Kinsel 783 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    where the Louisiana Supreme Court held that evidence of prior rapes or attempted rapes by defendant of the victim was properly admitted.
  • State v. Malvoisin 779 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Zornes 774 So. 2d 1062 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    For plan, system, and opportunity, (La.App.
  • State v. Black 757 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    The trial court found that the evidence of the molestation offenses committed by Mr. Black against the victim's sisters tended to prove the appellant's lustful disposition toward young children, not just towards women in general.
  • State v. McArthur 719 So. 2d 1037 La. 1998
  • State v. Miller 718 So. 2d 960 La. 1998
  • State v. Coleman 673 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Broussard 649 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    773 , (1950) [3] , and prior sex crimes committed against the same prosecutrix admitted to show a lustful disposition toward that victim
  • State v. Jamison 640 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Dixon 628 So. 2d 1295 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    In response to the defendant's objection to the introduction of the other crimes evidence, the State's attorney argued and the trial judge held that the evidence was admissible without a
  • State v. Tolliver 621 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
    For plan, system, and opportunity, (La.
  • State v. Jamison 617 So. 2d 480 La. 1993
  • State v. Osborne 593 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Esponge 593 So. 2d 677 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Long 590 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Bailey 588 So. 2d 90 La. 1991
  • State v. Rasberry 564 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Baker 552 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Baker 535 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    State v. Ferrand, 210 La.
  • State v. Howard 520 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Orgeron 512 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. David 505 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Trigueros 485 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    However, when ruling that evidence of other crimes committed by the defendant upon the person of the victim was admissible, to be controlling, In Acliese, supra at 667 , the court noted: *570 “Evidence of other crimes related to the offense with which a defendant is charged is inadmissible except under special exceptions.
  • State v. Childs 466 So. 2d 1363 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • Phillips v. Plaquemines Parish School Bd. 465 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Kelly 456 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Lathers 444 So. 2d 96 La. 1983
  • State v. Kahey 436 So. 2d 475 La. 1983
    773 , (1950), prior sex crimes committed against the same prosecutrix, and cases cited therein, and evidence of criminal acts of the accused constituting admissions by conduct intended to obstruct justice or avoid punishment for the present crime
  • State v. Goodman 427 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Telsee 425 So. 2d 1251 La. 1983
  • State v. Bolton 408 So. 2d 250 La. 1981
    this Court upheld the trial court's admitting evidence of prior sexual assaults by defendant on the victim to show his lustful disposition toward her.