Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hicks, 403 So. 2d 676.
- State v. Lennon 661 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
- State v. Wiley 597 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
- State v. Vail 571 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
- State v. Lewis 564 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
- State v. Lea 499 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
-
State v. Green
480 So. 2d 883
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
it was noted that: The trial court is required to comply with the sentencing guidelines of LSA-C.Cr.P.
-
State v. Rice
471 So. 2d 837
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
which held that when the sentence is the result of plea bargaining culminating in a plea of guilty with the sentence to be given understood and agreed to there was no necessity to articulate reasons for sentence under Art. 894.1.
- State v. Dickerson 446 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
-
State v. Brown
441 So. 2d 828
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
As stated by Justice Lemon, : “ * * * If the record supports the sentence, for example by showing (as the record in this case does) that the accused significantly reduced his total sentencing liability by agreeing to a negotiated sentence, then the attack should be rejected.” In finding that there was no reversible error resulting from
- State v. Murdock 438 So. 2d 1314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Wilson 438 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
- State v. Bell 438 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
- Criticized State v. Lewis 434 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- Criticized State v. Benton 432 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Buckenburger 428 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Smack 425 So. 2d 737 La. 1983