Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Nicholas, 397 So. 2d 1308.

45 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Teddy Chester La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
State ex rel. D.M. 247 So. 3d 133 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
See also, State v. Nicholas , , 1316 (La.
State of Louisiana v. David Wayne Leday La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Leday 930 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Camese 791 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Flagg 760 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
see also, (flight is a factor to be considered in ascertaining the existence of probable cause).
State v. Francis 748 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
State v. Flanagan 691 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
(flight is a factor to be considered in ascertaining the existence of probable cause).
State v. Armstrong 683 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Carter 663 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Young 642 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Campbell 640 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Dotson 598 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Robertson 557 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
State v. Collins 546 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
the trial court limited inquiry at the suppression hearing to suggestiveness.
State v. Hodges 526 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Neslo, supra at 78 ; (La.
State v. Gardner 524 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Garcia 519 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Hupp 514 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Ancar 508 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Gordon 504 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Freeman 503 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Smith 477 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. James 461 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Jones 457 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Tuesno 456 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. McKinney 455 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Tate 454 So. 2d 391 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Crawford 454 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Manson v. Brathwaite, supra; State v. Prudholm, supra
State v. Miller 451 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Franklin 449 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Westfall 446 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971)
State v. Roberson 445 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
State v. Robinson, supra .
State v. Robinson 442 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
In a similar case, the court concluded *830 that, given the evidence and viewing the voir dire as a whole, any error by the trial judge in limiting the scope of defendant's voir dire was harmless.
State v. Anderson 440 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. LeCompte 441 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
citing Ker v. California, 374 U.S. 23 , 83 S.Ct.
State v. Foster 437 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Neslo 433 So. 2d 73 La. 1983
State v. Marchese 430 So. 2d 1303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Williams 420 So. 2d 1116 La. 1982
State v. Stucke 419 So. 2d 939 La. 1982
State v. Age 417 So. 2d 1183 La. 1982
State v. Crain 409 So. 2d 603 La. 1982
State v. Drott 412 So. 2d 984 La. 1982
State v. Bradford, supra ; (La.
State v. Lindsey 404 So. 2d 466 La. 1981
Manson v. Brathwaite, supra.