Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Frank, 472 So. 2d 1.
- In Re Frank 942 So. 2d 1050 La. 2006
- In re Steinhardt 883 So. 2d 404 La. 2004
-
In re Carr
874 So. 2d 823
La. 2004
Louisiana State Bar Ass’
-
In re Laudumiey
849 So. 2d 515
La. 2003
Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Frank
-
In re Nevitte
827 So. 2d 1135
La. 2002
In re: Brown, 95-0817 (La.5/21/96), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Frank
- In re Bankston 810 So. 2d 1113 La. 2002
- In Re Spring 801 So. 2d 327 La. 2001
- In Re Brown 674 So. 2d 243 La. 1996
- Dubuclet v. Home Ins. Co. 660 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
-
Alexander v. State Bd. of Med. Examiners
644 So. 2d 238
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Alexander contends that the Board's refusal to admit this evidence was erroneous and taints the Board's findings, (1985).
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Wilkinson 562 So. 2d 902 La. 1990
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Porterfield 550 So. 2d 584 La. 1989
-
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Dutel
542 So. 2d 503
La. 1989
a disciplinary proceeding based on the conviction of a crime, we held that although the conviction was conclusive evidence of guilt (Art. 15, § 8(a)(7)(c)), the facts underlying the conviction of the crime were extremely important in the determination of the appropriate discipline.
-
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Farmer
537 So. 2d 1148
La. 1989
See also, at 181 (La.1985), at 2 (La.1985).
-
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Brumfield
532 So. 2d 1164
La. 1988
a disciplinary proceeding based on the conviction of a crime, we held that although the conviction was conclusive evidence of guilt (Art. 15, § 8(a)(7)(c)), the facts underlying the conviction of the crime were extremely important in the determination of the appropriate discipline.
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Garraway 520 So. 2d 400 La. 1988
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Reis 513 So. 2d 1173 La. 1987
-
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Meyer
478 So. 2d 1211
La. 1985
Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Frank, Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Vesich, supra.
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Vesich 476 So. 2d 811 La. 1985