Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Matter of Succession of Dunham, 408 So. 2d 888.

48 citing documents.

Succession of John Kelley Martin La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
Ted Wayne Cox, Jr. and April Ann Cox v. Lenzie Beth Dupuis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
The Louisiana Supreme Court in explained: [W]hile mere animosity is not sufficient ground for removal of the trustee, the statutory provisions relative to the responsibilities of a trustee are very rigid and hold the trustee to an even higher fiduciary responsibility to his beneficiary than that owed by a s
In the Matter of the Succession of Marilyn Ann Barbier La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
A mere conflict of interest between the succession representative and the heirs is not a sufficient ground for the removal of the succession representative, ( La.
Carl Winn Fontenot v. Anita M. Fontenot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Succession of Ronnie Mack Goodman La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
1976), the Louisiana Supreme Court held, “[E]ven in a case where compliance with the stock transfer legislation may substitute for the codal formalities of a donation, the substantive requirements of a divestment and donative intent must be fulfilled in order to effect a valid donation.” See also, (La.
Elaine T. Marshall, Individually and as Co-Trustee of the Marshall Legacy Foundation and The Marshall Heritage Foundation v. … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Elaine T. Marshall, individually and as Co-Trustee of the Marshall Legacy Foundation and the Marshall Heritage Foundation v. … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
In the Matter of the Succession of Jesse R. Coleman, Sr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
3d , 2019WL6906974, * 5) ( quoting Succession ofDunham, - 01 ( La.
Jonathan Scott Chouest v. Kirt Chouest and Kellie Chouest Duet La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
In re Harrier Trust 264 So. 3d 526 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
As stated by the supreme court in Succession of Dunham , , 900 (La.1981) : [T]he statutory provisions relative to the responsibilities of a trustee are very rigid and hold the trustee to an even higher fiduciary responsibility to his beneficiary than that owed by a succession representative to heirs.
McCaffery v. Lindner 263 So. 3d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Succession of Dunham , , 901 (La.
Tedeton v. Tedeton 137 So. 3d 686 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Champagne v. Champagne 992 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
-94 (La.1981); Succession of Payne, 459 So.2d at 1233 .
Hewitt v. Safeway Ins. Co. of Louisiana 787 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Succession of Gibbens 773 So. 2d 892 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
In ^considering removal of a trustee for a potential conflict of interest, the Supreme Court stated, “it must be shown that he has mismanaged the estate or breached one or more of his required duties.” In re Mary Belsome Welsh Qualified Trust, 97-1042 (La.9/26/97)
Hartnett v. LGD Properties, Inc. 767 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
In re Mary Belsome Welsh Qualified Trust 701 So. 2d 970 La. 1997
In re Succession of Lewis 700 So. 2d 1002 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Cir.1980), modified and (La.App.
In re Mary Belsom Welsh Qualified Trust 696 So. 2d 549 La. 1997
Succession of Steckler 665 So. 2d 561 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
1st Cir.1980), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, (La.App.
Succession of Songne 664 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
They concede that a potential conflict of interest does not constitute sufficient grounds to remove an executrix, until the executrix mismanages the estate or violates her fiduciary duties to other heirs or legatees, which they claim Brenda has done in the case sub judice.
Slocum v. Slocum-Stevens Insurance Agency 636 So. 2d 1156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Belle Pass Terminal, Inc. v. Jolin, Inc. 634 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Albritton v. Albritton 622 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Blackwell v. Blackwell 606 So. 2d 1355 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Miller v. Lake Arthur Reclamation Co. 558 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Razzaghe-Ashrafi v. Razzaghe-Ashrafi 558 So. 2d 1368 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Varacalle v. Turner 556 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
In -897 (La.1981), Justice Calogero wrote for the majority: La.Civ.Code art. 2456, relating to when a sale is perfected, provides: The sale is considered to be perfect between the parties, and the property is of right acquired to the purchaser with regard to the seller, as soon as there exists an agreement for the ob
Succession of Orlando 531 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
(5th Cir. 1983) writ denied
Ark-La-Tex Timber Co. v. Georgia Casualty & Surety Co. 516 So. 2d 1217 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
1st Cir.1980), writ granted modified on other grounds
In re Bradford Trust 524 So. 2d 1213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Bank of Greensburg v. Forrest 510 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Bernard v. First Republic Life Insurance Co. 510 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Plaintiff argues that the statute is only applicable to third persons, and not between the parties, (La.
Succession of Goudeau 480 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Succession of Velasquez-Bain 471 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
See the rationale of: Matter of the Succession of Dunham ([La].1981) Primeaux vs. Lebersat [Libersat] (La.
Dunham v. Anderson-Dunham, Inc. 466 So. 2d 1317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Dunham v. Dunham 467 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
The final decision removing Mrs. Dunham as executrix was rendered October 8, 1981, in )
Succession of Payne v. Pigott 459 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Burns v. Holiday Travels, Inc. 459 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
1st Cir. 1980), modified on other grounds
Curtis v. Breaux 458 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Moreau v. Moreau 457 So. 2d 1285 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Succession of Montgomery 452 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
C & a TRACTOR CO. v. Holland American Ins. Co. 445 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Mahmud v. Mahmud 444 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Gilbert v. Gilbert 442 So. 2d 1330 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Art. 2334, and Comment B [2]
Wilson v. HJ Wilson Co., Inc. 430 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
In the Matter of Succession of Dunham 428 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
By judgment of the Louisiana Supreme Court dated September 8, 1981 (rehearings denied October 9, 1981) and reported at (La.
Jackson v. Jackson 425 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982