DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jackson v. American Ins. Co., 404 So. 2d 218.

66 citing documents.

  • Lemoine v. Town of Simmesport 998 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • Janet C. Lemoine v. Town of Simmesport La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • Obein v. Mitcham Peach Farms, LLC 997 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • Girard v. Patterson State Bank 950 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
  • Hughes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 864 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Co., the Supreme Court referred to three factors in considering whether recreational or social activities engaged in by an employee arise out of or in the course of his employment: (1) They occur on the premises during a lunch or recreation period as a regular incident of the employment; or (2) The employer, by e
  • Winkler v. Wadleigh Offshore, Inc. 817 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    the Supreme Court set forth the following factors for determining whether recreational or social activities are within the course of employment: (1) They occur on the premises during a lunch or recreation period as a regular incident of the employment; or (2) The employer, by expressly or impliedly req
  • Lexington House v. Gleason 733 So. 2d 123 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
  • Malveaux v. American Manufacturing Co. 597 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    our Supreme Court rejected a “boilerplate question” analysis of whether or not recreation *1194 al activities were within the course of employment.
  • Tuminello v. Willis Knighton Medical Center 597 So. 2d 1089 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    3d Cir.1991), writ denied where an employee was injured during an awards banquet held at the Petroleum Club of Lafayette; where an employee drowned during a voluntary swimming party during working hours.
  • Mundy v. Dept. of Health & Human Resources 580 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
    Co., Palermo v. Reliance Ins.
  • Hanks v. Grey Wolf Drilling Co. 574 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    Such mutual benefits serve to place the ostensibly social activity within the course of employment because “the employer derives substantial direct benefit from the activity beyond the intangible value of improvement in employee health and morale that is common to all kinds of recreation and social life.” at 219 (La.1981).
  • Meaux v. Cormier 554 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
    Co., a sixteen-year-old boy employed in a government sponsored summer youth program drowned while attending a swimming party sponsored by his employer.
  • Glory v. ZUPPARDO'S ECONO. SUPERMARKET, INC. 532 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
  • Lee v. Union Carbide Corp. 506 So. 2d 204 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    receives personal injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment....” The classic tests for a determination of applicability of worker’s
  • Palermo v. Reliance Ins. Co. 501 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • Harris v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 485 So. 2d 965 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986