Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Capitol City Leasing Corp. v. Hill, 404 So. 2d 935.

22 citing documents.

  • Mark Stephen Jaskot and Diane M. Robertson Jaskot v. Lyle K. Doublet and Riverside Inspections, LLC La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
    art. 2541 is the difference between the sale price and the price that a reasonable buyer would have paid if he had known of the defects.” (La.
  • Ryan v. Case New Holland, Inc. 211 So. 3d 611 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • Cameron v. Bruce 106 So. 3d 587 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    Such a seller is called a “bad faith seller.” Id., Revision Comments (f), (g)
  • Royal v. Cook 984 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • Connell v. Davis 940 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
  • Joseph Malmay v. Western Star Trucks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • Malmay v. Western Star Trucks 903 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
  • Ollis v. Miller 886 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    (La.1981); Agee v. Speers, 35,600 (La.App.2d Cir.12/19/01), .
  • Magee v. Brown 859 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    However, the Supreme Court held: IsCompensation for the buyer’s use, however, ought not be granted automatically by the courts; even the value of an extensive use may be overridden by great inconveniences incurred because of the defective nature of the thing and constant interruptions in service caused by the s
  • Chastant v. Oasys Imaging, Inc. 839 So. 2d 1124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • Kent v. Cobb 811 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    2531 and 2545; Fruge v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S. A., Inc., 96-1065 (La.App.
  • Morrison v. Allstar Dodge, Inc. 792 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    However, our supreme court held: Compensation for the buyer's use, however, ought not be granted automatically *17 by the courts; even the value of an extensive use may be overridden by great inconveniences incurred because of the defective nature of the thing and constant interruptions in service caused by the
  • INS. STORAGE POOL v. Parish Nat. Bank 732 So. 2d 815 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • Destefano v. Crump 694 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
  • Fruge v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. 692 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    Regarding credit for use, Compensation for the buyer’s use, however, ought not be granted automatically by the courts; even the value of an extensive use may be overridden by great inconveniences incurred because of the defective nature of the thing and constant interruptions in service caused by the seller’s attempts to repair
  • Robert v. Bayou Bernard Marine, Inc. 514 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    AMF further asserts that one of the principal elements in formulating reduction of price is the cost of repairs, citing Griffin v. Coleman Oldsmobile, supra; Ball v. Ford Motor Co., supra
  • Angelle v. Energy Builders Co., Inc. 496 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    The Supreme Court ruled that a lessor/
  • Landry v. Nobility Homes, Inc. 488 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    Furthermore, the Court of Appeal, found no credit should have been awarded due to the inconvenience and expense caused to the plaintiff.
  • Rowell v. Carter Mobile Homes, Inc. 482 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    App.1st Cir.1981), remanded on other grounds
  • Prime Time Television, Inc. v. Coastal Computer Systems, Inc. 484 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    The trial court in its reasons for judgment upheld the waiver of warranties and rights by First Continental in this commercial lease
  • Gulf Oil Corp. v. Marine Concrete Structures, Inc. 464 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    1 In addition, where the Louisiana Supreme Court upheld an assignment of warranty rights from a lessor to a lessee finding no prohibition by the Civil Code to assigning warranty rights.
  • Rozas v. Eunice Implement Co. 460 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984