DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Pace v. Cage, 419 So. 2d 443.

18 citing documents.

  • Futch v. Commercial Union Insurance Co. 654 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    See Bosch, 520 So.2d at 724 ; (La.App.
  • Egros v. Pempton 606 So. 2d 780 La. 1992
    See Bosch, 520 So.2d at 724 ; (La.
  • Morrison v. Gonzalez 602 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • Provident Life and Acc. Ins. v. Turner 582 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • Sharp v. Daigre 555 So. 2d 1361 La. 1990
    Niemann ; Pace v. Cage, *1364
  • Sharp v. Daigre 545 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • Pareti v. Sentry Indem. Co. 536 So. 2d 417 La. 1988
    and Niemann v. Travelers Ins.
  • Henry v. Kipker 525 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    See footnote 7 at page 164, and Judge Blanche’s dissenting opinion at page 444 in Pace v. Cage, ...” [ ].
  • Bosch v. Cummings 520 So. 2d 721 La. 1988
  • Bosch v. Cummings 510 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    She relies on an interpretation of the above statutory provision which limits the insurer’s for the proposition that where the victim first releases the tort-feasor, he has no remaining cause or right of action that he may subro-gate to his uninsured motorist carrier.
  • Delaune v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 506 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • Moncrief v. Panepinto 489 So. 2d 938 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
  • Jilek v. Covert 465 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • Audubon Ins. Co. v. Farr 453 So. 2d 232 La. 1984
  • Roy v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co. 453 So. 2d 564 La. 1984
    which held that an uninsured motorist carrier cannot recover from a tortfeasor when the insured had completely discharged the tortfeasor before the uninsured motorist carrier made any payment to the insured, because the insured had no rights against his former debtor to subrogate to the insurer.
  • Stroud v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 429 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    However, the Supreme Court held that where the insured had completely discharged the tortfeasor from any obligation to him in return for a cash payment of $5,000.00 before the uninsured motorist carrier had made any payment to the insured, that the insured had no rights against his former debtor to subrogate to the
  • Chiasson v. Whitney 427 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
    22:1406(D)(4), which seems to grant an independent right of recovery
  • Brown v. Yasso 424 So. 2d 1157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982