Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Kraaz v. La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc., 410 So. 2d 1048.

24 citing documents.

William Campbell v. Orient-Express Hotels Louisiana, Inc., Windsor Court Hotel Inc. of Delaware, Windsor Court Hotel, L.L.C., Windsor … La. 2025
resulting from violent crime;” however, our jurisprudence also reflects that an innkeeper “has a duty to take reasonable precautions against criminals.” Kraaz v. La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc., (La.
Officer John Doe, Police Officer v. Deray Mckesson; Black Lives Matter; Black Lives Matter Network, Incorporated La. 2022
App. 4 Cir. 1992) (private transport company assumed a d uty to protect third parties from the deviant behavior of those in its custody, particularly, “predictable risks of assaults;”) (4) innkeeper and guest (see Kraaz v. La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc., (hotel liable for damages suffered by guests who were robbed and assaulted inside their hotel room when the desk clerk gave the robber the master key); see also Banks v. Hyatt Corp., 722 F.2d 214 (5th Cir. 1984) (applying Louisiana law, a negligent
Dearmon v. St. Ann Lodging, L. L.C. 267 So. 3d 639 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
4 Cir. 7/16/14), , 757 (quoting Kraaz v. La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc. , , 1053 (La.
Finch v. HRI Lodging, Inc. 152 So. 3d 1039 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Kraaz v. La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc., Jackson, supra.
Salafian v. Gabriel 146 So. 3d 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
In the specific instance of an innkeeper, the Louisiana Supreme Court held in Kraaz v. La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc. that [a]n innkeeper does not insure his guests against the risk of injury or property loss resulting from violent crime.
Gray v. Holiday Inns, Inc. 762 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Kraaz v. LaQuinta Motor Inns, Inc., Jones v. Hyatt Corp. of Delaware, 94-2194 (La.App.
Hollander v. Days Inn Motel 739 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
The duty of an innkeeper to his guest was set out in Kraaz v. La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc., which states “[a] guest is entitled to a high degree of care and protection.
Hollander v. Days Inn Motel 705 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Kraaz v. LaQuinta Motor Inns, Inc., Franklin v. Paul Dupuis & Associates, (La.App.
Jones v. Hyatt Corp. of Delaware 681 So. 2d 381 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Kraaz v. LaQuinta Motor Inns, Inc., Banks v. Hyatt Corp., 722 F.2d 214 (5 Cir.1984).
Searcy v. La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc. 676 So. 2d 1137 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
They further argued the hotel did not post a valid notice in the area of the registration desk or anywhere in the lobby, and the notice posted behind the guest room doors was not conspicuous pursuant to the holding of Kraaz v. La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc., at 1051-1053 (La.1982).
Norred v. Radisson Hotel Corp. 665 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Kraaz v. La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc.
Jackson v. Ferrand 658 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
In reaching that decision, the court quoted the following statement made by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Kraaz v. La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc., : An innkeeper does not insure his guests against the risk of injury or property loss resulting from violent crime.
Potter v. First Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'n of Scotlandville 602 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
[3] *1074 Plaintiff asserts Kraaz v. La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc., (La.
Ledbetter v. Concord General Corporation 564 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Kraaz v. LaQuinta Motor Inns, Inc.
O'ROURKE v. Hilton Hotels Corp. 560 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
In Kraaz v. LaQuinta Motor Inns, Inc., there was some doubt as to whether or not the article had been posted in the room, since allegedly neither the investigating officers nor the plaintiff saw the notice.
Franklin v. Paul Dupuis & Associates 543 So. 2d 970 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
The Louisiana Supreme Court in the case of Kraaz v. La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc., set forth the applicable standard of care.
Gregor v. Constitution State Ins. Co. 534 So. 2d 1340 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Kraaz v. La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc., Brown v. Harlan, 468 So.
Wong v. East Baton Rouge Parish Sheriff's Office 522 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
See, for example, Borden, Kraaz v. La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc.
Brown v. Harlan 468 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
The Louisiana Supreme Court, in Kraaz v. La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc., held that the innkeeper's position vis-a-vis his guests is similar to that of a common carrier toward its passengers.
Atkins v. Frazell 470 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Kraaz v. LaQuinta Motor Inns, Inc., (La.
Lorio v. San Antonio Inn 454 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
The rule applicable to this case is that while an innkeeper does not insure his guests against the risk of injury, he nonetheless owes his guest a high degree of care, Kraaz v. La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc.
Landry v. St. Charles Inn, Inc. 446 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Kraaz v. LaQuinta Motor Inns, Inc.
Davenport v. Nixon 434 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
In Kraaz v. LaQuinta Motor Inns, Inc., the Supreme Court set forth the duty of innkeepers to protect their guests against criminal acts as follows: "An innkeeper does not insure his guests against the risk of injury or property loss resulting from violent crime.
Martin v. COTTON'S PEST AID CONTROL, ETC. 424 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
In Kraaz v. La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court held a negligent innkeeper liable for the loss occasioned by armed robbers.