Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Felder v. Georgia Pac. Corp., 405 So. 2d 521.

85 citing documents.

Johnette Martin v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Amanda Z. Martin, and Gregory F. Martin La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2026
Precept Credit Opportunities Fund, L.P. v. Terina L. Walker, American Acceptance, Inc., the United States of America, John … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
App. 4 Cir. 2/11/94), (-24 (La.
William Thomas Coppage v. Transdev Services, Inc., New Orleans Regional Transit Authority La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
Zamanian v. Ochsner Med. Ctr.-Kenner, L.L.C. 248 So. 3d 706 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Melvin R. Lucas, Jr., Et Ux. v. Rapides Healthcare System, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Sullivan, 671 So.2d at 317 (
Lucas v. Rapides Health Care System, L.L.C. 216 So. 3d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Sullivan, 671 So.2d at 317 (
ECW Recoveries v. Woodward 196 So. 3d 122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
1 Cir. 5/14/04) , , citing
Brian M. Stelly v. Jeanne B. Stelly La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
held “where two instruments, when read together, outline the obligations each party has to the other and evidence each party’s acquiescence in the agreement,” the requirement of a writing is met.
Betty Hebert Geer v. Bp America Production Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Relative to the necessity of a writing, -24 (La.1981), has stated that: [T]he requirement that the agreement be in writing and signed by both parties does not necessarily mean that the agreement must be contained in one document.
Geer v. BP America Production Co. 150 So. 3d 621 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Relative to the necessity of a writing, -24 (La.1981), has stated that: [T]he requirement that the agreement be in writing and signed by both parties does not necessarily mean that the agreement must be contained in one document.
Evelyn Thiels Holt, Et Ux. v. Ace American Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Holt v. Ace American Insurance Co. 149 So. 3d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Sylvia Lemoine v. Xavier Desmond Thornton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Corp., held “where two instruments, when read together, outline the obligations each party has to the other and evidence each party’s acquiescence in the agreement,” the writing requirements are met.
Lemoine v. Thornton 161 So. 3d 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Corp., held “where two instruments, when read together, outline the obligations each party has to the other and evidence *671 each party’s acquiescence in the agreement,” the writing requirements are met.
Succession of Hester B. Wilson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Davis v. Garrison Property & Casualty Insurance Co. 119 So. 3d 927 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“where two instruments, when read together, outline the obligations each party has to the other and evidence each party’s acquiescence in the agreement, a written compromise agreement, as contemplated by La.
Succession of James Robert Cole, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Succession of Cole 108 So. 3d 240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Phyllis Venable v. the Prudential Insurance Co. of America La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
-24 (La.1981), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that a settlement need not be contained in one document and “where two instruments, when read together, outline the obligations each party has to the other and evidence each party‟s acquiescence in the agreement,” that is sufficient to meet the writing requirem
Venable v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America 86 So. 3d 101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
-24 (La.1981), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that a settlement need not be contained in one document and “where two instruments, when read together, outline the obligations each party has to the other and evidence each party’s acquiescence in the agreement,” that is sufficient to meet the writing requirement.
Bourque v. PETER KEWIT SON'S CO. 73 So. 3d 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In an earlier case, the court had held that although a signed writing was needed, that writing could be in more than one document so long as the documents when read together evince the parties’ agreement as to the terms contained therein.
Howard v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corp. 65 So. 3d 697 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 2/11/94) , (-524 (La.1981)).
Gulf Coast Bank and Trust Co. v. Elmore 57 So. 3d 553 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Sims v. USAgencies Casualty Insurance Co. 68 So. 3d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
art. 3072; 3 Bennett v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, 95-0410, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
Dozier v. Rhodus 17 So. 3d 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
” and stated therein: The Code requires that compromise agreements be in writing, by implication signed by both parties.
Larabell v. Vega 996 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Klebanoff v. Haberle 978 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Mark Peltier v. Manuel Builders, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Our Louisiana Supreme Court, held that even though La.Civ.Code art. 3071 does not provide for the consequences of failing to reduce a compromise into writing, “a compromise which is not reduced to writing is unenforceable.” Jasmin v. Gafney, Inc.
Peltier v. Manuel Builders, LLC 976 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Our Louisiana Supreme Court, held that even though La.Civ.
Bank One, NA v. Payton 968 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Elder v. Elder & Elder Enterprises, Ltd. 948 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 2/11/94), (-524 (La.1981)).
Julie Simon Albarado v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Albarado v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. 926 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Rein v. Luke Edwards, LLC 921 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Corp., (wherein the supreme court found that a written and signed draft containing a notation of full release of all claims constituted a written acceptance of a settlement offer).
Harry Rein, J.D. M.D. v. Luke Edwards, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Corp., (wherein the supreme court found that a written and signed draft containing a notation of full release of all claims constituted a written acceptance of a settlement offer).
Southern Nights, Inc. v. Barnett 881 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. Hawkins 879 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Corp., Brasseaux v. Allstate Ins.
Hawthorne v. Barbier 841 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Felder v. Georgia Pacific Corp,, Orgeron v. Security Indus.
Merritt v. Safeway Insurance Co. of Louisiana 836 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
as follows: [T]he requirement that the agreement be in writing and signed by both parties does not necessarily mean that the agreement must be contained in one document.
Doiron v. La. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. 753 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Sweet v. IBERIA PARISH SCHOOL BD. 746 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Woodrow Wilson Construction Co. v. Fashion Café, L.L.C. 745 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
In Re Peter 735 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Cochennic v. City of New Orleans ex rel. Mosquito Control Unit of the Health Department of New Orleans 722 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Lavan v. Nowell 708 So. 2d 1052 La. 1998
Sullivan, 671 So.2d at 317 ().
Brasseaux v. Allstate Ins. Co. 710 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Dammann v. Molero 709 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that the requirement of La.
Lavan v. Nowell 702 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
DeSoto v. DeSoto 694 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Desoto v. Desoto 694 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997