DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Naquin v. Uniroyal, Inc., 405 So. 2d 525.

71 citing documents.

  • Polk v. US Fidelity & Guar. Ins. Co. 578 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
    Naquin v. Uniroyal, Inc.
  • Thibodeaux v. Woman's Hosp. of Acadiana 578 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
    Naquin v. Uniroyal, Inc.
  • Benton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 545 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    In Naquin v. Uniroyal, Inc., the court held that a supervisory employer, who occasionally did physical labor, was partially disabled by a shoulder injury which made him unable to perform some of his former duties even though he was retained in his old job at full pay.
  • Gardner v. Normal Life Inc. 542 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    Naquin v. Uniroyal, Inc., ” In the present case, the trial court based its determination of the award of attorney’s fees on the facts that the case was not lengthy; did not present any unusual circumstances; and, the recovery allowed the plaintiff was minimal, involving only expenses for rehabilitation.
  • Hernandez v. FW Woolworth Co. 516 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
    Naquin v. Uniroyal, Inc., (La.
  • Mott v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 486 So. 2d 112 La. 1986
    1982); Naquin v. Uniroyal, Inc.
  • Butts v. Procter & Gamble Co. 465 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    er or not the same or a similar occupation as that in which the employee was customarily engaged when injured and whether or not an occupation for which the employee, at the time of injury, was particularly fitted by reason of education, training, and experience, during the period of disability.’ “The above statute was construed by our Supreme Court in the recent case of Naquin v. Uniroyal, Inc., (La.
  • Connelly v. Buck Kreihs Co. 463 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    1982); Naquin v. Uniroyal, Inc.
  • Dauzat v. Gregory & Cook, Inc. 454 So. 2d 807 La. 1984
    For instance in Naquin v. Uniroyal, Inc., we stated: The statute clearly provides that an employee is eligible for compensation for a partially disabling work-related injury regardless of whether his employment continues; only the amount of compensation due may be affected by wages actually earned after the injury.
  • LaFleur v. Hartford Ins. Co. 449 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    See Naquin v. Uniroyal, Inc., and Stracener v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, (La.
  • Thomas v. Gregory & Cook, Inc. 445 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    Naquin v. Uniroyal, Inc.
  • Gales v. Dresser Industries, Inc. 444 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Naquin v. Uniroyal, Inc.
  • Delco v. Heritage Manor Nursing Home 441 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    Naquin v. Uniroyal, Inc.
  • Watson v. Louisiana Paving Co. 441 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    Naquin v. Uniroyal, Inc.
  • Orgeron v. Tri-State Road Boring, Inc. 434 So. 2d 65 La. 1983
    Zachary Co., supra; Dodd v. Nicolon Corp., supra ; Naquin v. Uniroyal, Inc., Lattin v. Hica Corp., supra .
  • Crocker v. Home Insurance Co. 428 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    See Naquin v. Uniroyal, Inc.
  • Patin v. Continental Cas. Co. 424 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    [2] Dodd v. Nicolon Corporation, et al., Naquin v. Uniroyal, Inc.
  • Martin v. HB Zachry Co. 424 So. 2d 1002 La. 1982
    cf. Dodd V. Nicolon Corp., supra ; Naquin v. Uniroyal, Inc., Lattin v. Hica Corp., supra ; Dusang v. Henry C. Beck Builders, Inc., supra ; see also Graham v. Jones Bros. Co., Inc., (La.App.
  • Dodd v. Nicolon Corp. 422 So. 2d 398 La. 1982
    Recently, in Naquin v. Uniroyal, Inc., this court found a claimant to be partially disabled when his work-related injury prevented him from performing significant physical tasks which were expected by his employer and important to the effective performance of his work, even though the physical tasks were incidental to his supervisory position.
  • Distinguished Stracener v. US Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 410 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    The facts of this case are clearly distinguishable from those before the supreme court in Naquin v. Uniroyal, Inc., No. 81-C-1081, rendered September 28, 1981
  • Spillers v. Cities Service Co. 406 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    Naquin v. Uniroyal, Inc.