Super v. Super
Also decided on this docket: La., May 29, 1981 399 So. 2d 583
Super v. Super, 399 So. 2d 583 (La. 1981).
Cited by
- State v. Ledet 701 So. 2d 1067 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
- State v. Baum 663 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
- Alford v. Alford 610 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- State ex rel. C.H. 595 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- Vesper v. Vesper 469 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
- Johnson v. Johnson 452 So. 2d 322 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
- Caire v. Caire 452 So. 2d 194 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
- Whipple v. Smith 428 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- Rodrigue v. Rodrigue 424 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- Vorisek v. Vorisek 423 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
- Hamiter v. Hamiter 419 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Opinion text
399 So.2d 583 (1981) Madeleine Marie Burke SUPER v. William C. SUPER, M.D. No. 81-C-1178. Supreme Court of Louisiana. May 29, 1981. Writ denied. LEMMON, J., would grant the writ for the reasons assigned. LEMMON, Justice, dissenting from denial of writ application. I would grant the writ. The parties, both previously married, were only married five years before they were divorced. The alimony award (which does not include any award for child support) is 24% of the husband's gross income. The wife is young and healthy, but has never worked. The wife should be required to attempt to earn some wages, or the award should be reduced in proportion to the earning ability.