DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc., 411 So. 2d 1042.

99 citing documents.

  • Harrigan v. Freeman 498 So. 2d 58 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc., Jordan v. Travelers Insurance Company, 257 La.
  • Jordan v. National Medical Enterprises, Inc. 492 So. 2d 204 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.
  • Boudreaux v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. 490 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    However as pointed out by Jude Calogera [sic] in Schouest [v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.] , and by Section 275, page 615 of Volume 13, Louisiana Civil Law Treatise, ‘Worker’s Compensation’, written by Malone & Johnson, the purpose of the 1975 Amendment, was to take people like plaintiff, out of the total permanent provisions R.S.
  • Sims v. Travelers Indemnity Co. 491 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Furthermore, medical testimony ‘must be weighed in the light of other credible evidence of a nonmedical character, such as a sequence of symptoms or events in order to judicially determine probability’ ...” Schouest v. J Ray McDermott & Co., -45 (La.1982).
  • Hollars v. EMES Management Corp. 490 So. 2d 482 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Furthermore, medical testimony must be weighed in the light of other credible evidence of a nonmedical character, such as a sequence of symptoms or events in order to judicially determine probability ...,” Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., -45 (La.1982).
  • Stevenson v. Bolton Co., Inc. 484 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.
  • Matherne v. Gold Crest Cleaners, Inc. 486 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Jaeckle v. Dresser Industries, Inc., Schoest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc., , (La.1982).
  • Perrodin v. Martin Mills, Inc. 484 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    The Supreme Court, in Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc., reiterated that “medical testimony ‘must be weighed in the light of other credible evidence of a non-medical character, such as a sequence of symptoms or events in order to judicially determine probability’.” [Citations omitted] Perrodin testified that he enjoyed his job, and that he had a good relationship
  • Fontenot v. G.L. Manuel Conoco, Co. 482 So. 2d 1041 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.
  • Davis v. Oilfield Scrap & Equipment Co. 482 So. 2d 970 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    [3] For a case with similar reasoning, see Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Company, Inc.
  • Tucker v. Associated Grocers, Inc. 473 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    See, Justice Lemmon's concurring opinion in Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.
  • Fusilier v. Northbrook Excess & Surplus Ins. Co. 471 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc., Jordan v. Travelers Ins.
  • Gibson v. Hayes Oilfield Const. Co. 467 So. 2d 1304 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    23:1221(1), (2); Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.
  • Edwards v. City of Leesville 465 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.
  • Connelly v. Buck Kreihs Co. 463 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc., Johnson v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., (La.App.
  • James v. Celotex Corp. 461 So. 2d 447 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Furthermore, medical testimony ‘must be weighed in the light of other credible evidence of a non-medical character, such as a sequence of symptoms or events in order to judicially determine probability’ Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., -45 (La.1982).” In determining causal connection, the court distinguished medical causation from legal causation as follows: “[6] The lower courts based their decisions upon the assertions of Dr. Gun-derson, Dr. Gore and Dr. Romsdahl that in their opinion a
  • Jaeckle v. Dresser Industries, Inc. 457 So. 2d 646 La. 1984
    Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.
  • Bourgeois v. Bill Watson's Investments, Inc. 458 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
    See Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott, & Co., Inc.
  • Latiolais v. Home Ins. Co. 454 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    23:1221(1), (2); Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.
  • Cooper v. Ami, Inc. 454 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co.
  • Ramsey v. Dragon Ltd. 448 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., (La.
  • Clark v. Pernie Bailey Drilling 445 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    As the Supreme Court stated in Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc., : ...
  • Reynolds v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 445 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    Zachry Co., Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc., Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., Gilcrease v. J.A.
  • Frix v. Supreme Catering Service & Aetna Insurance Co. 444 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    furthermore, medical testimony ‘must be weighed in the light of other credible evidence of a nonmedical character, such as a sequence of symptoms or events in order to judicially determine probability’ *713 ....” Schouest v. J Ray McDermott & Co.
  • Carter v. Highlands Insurance Co. 442 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • Thornell v. Payne & Keller, Inc. 442 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    The case of Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc., is cited as authority.
  • Fielder v. Triple S. Masonry 438 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    See Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc., (La.App.
  • Cotten v. Union Tank Car Co. 434 So. 2d 1219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    In Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc., the Supreme Court held “[ojffers of other employment are irrelevant in cases of partial disability.
  • Orgeron v. Tri-State Road Boring, Inc. 434 So. 2d 65 La. 1983
    Zachry Co., Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott and Co., Inc.
  • McCoy v. Kroger Co. 431 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc., Harris v. Argonaut Ins.
  • Shatoska v. Intern. Grain Transfer, Inc. 430 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.
  • Celestin v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. 430 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., -45 (La.1982).
  • Thum v. MRO Services Co., Inc. 430 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.
  • Field v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 427 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
    Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , (La.1982).
  • Hebert v. Lake Charles American Press 427 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., -45 (La.1982).
  • Antilley v. Sentry Ins. Co. 426 So. 2d 1370 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc., at 1044-1045 (La.1982).
  • Chisholm v. LS Womack, Inc. 424 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.
  • Martin v. Rollins Services Inc. 424 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
  • Martin v. HB Zachry Co. 424 So. 2d 1002 La. 1982
    2d 398 (La.1982); Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott and Co., Inc.
  • Naquin v. Texaco, Inc. 423 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc., quoting Jordan v. Travelers Insurance Company, 257 La.
  • Schilling v. Bigelow Liptak Corp. 427 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.
  • Dodd v. Nicolon Corp. 422 So. 2d 398 La. 1982
    Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott and Co., Inc.
  • Howard v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. 420 So. 2d 1190 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
    Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Company, Inc.
  • Johnson v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 422 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc., (La.
  • Bazile v. Pellerin Milnor Corp. 433 So. 2d 1058 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    See Dusang v. Henry C. Beck Builders, Inc., ” The doctrine as applied to substantial pain cases was further refined by the Supreme Court in Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., Allor v. Bel- *1060 den, and Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.
  • Walgamotte v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc. 420 So. 2d 1157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    In Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc., the Supreme Court held that plaintiff had not made out a prima facie case for odd lot classification.
  • Hammond v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York 419 So. 2d 829 La. 1982
    Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., -45 (La.1982).
  • Dupont v. Ebasco Services, Inc. 411 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
    Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott and Co., Inc., , Supreme Ct. (1982).
  • Powell v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. 410 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    His situation is similar to that considered in Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., , (La.1982).