Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Langlinais v. Guillotte, 407 So. 2d 1215.

33 citing documents.

Dorothy Banish Madden v. Steven Ray Fairburn, K.S. Timber Company, Inc., Plaza Insurance Co., Xyz Insurance Co., & … La. 2025
Board of Supervisors v. Guth 195 So. 3d 579 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Kinchen v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. 923 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Specifically, as to whether this suit against Metropolitan interrupted prescription against Stephen Rome, , 1218 n. 2 (La.1981).
Smith v. STATE, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES AND EDUCATIONAL AND TREATMENT COUNCIL, INC. 806 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Compton v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 796 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Etienne v. National Auto. Ins. Co. 759 So. 2d 51 La. 2000
: [I]t is well settled that under [former] La.
Niklaus v. Bellina 696 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Caillet v. Dykstra 666 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Rivard v. Petroleum Transport Co., Inc. 663 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
-19 (La.1981), a unanimous Supreme Court reversed dismissal of an amending petition, holding, inter alia, that a timely filed tort suit against a person in his individual capacity as the owner and purported operator of a vehicle and against his insurer interrupts prescription on a claim asserted by plaintiff in a
Gebhardt v. State 652 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Pineda v. Ruppel 639 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Waller v. Stuckey 613 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Spott v. Otis Elevator Co. 601 So. 2d 1355 La. 1992
Crosby v. Keys 590 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Mangham v. B. & C. Wood Company, Inc., writ denied
Arabie v. Northwest Min. Corp. 567 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Scott v. Burden 527 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Bernard v. WOODROW WILSON CONST. CO., INC. 526 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Brown v. City of Monroe 521 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
St. Romain v. Lambert 521 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Dapremont v. Kelly 479 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Caronna v. Curry 473 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Dixon v. Houck 466 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Pearson v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, Langlinais v. *60 Guillotte
Kleckley v. Hebert 464 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Lee v. Succession of Chapman 463 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Although ordinarily the defendant who alleges prescription has the burden to prove it, if plaintiff's petition plainly shows that prescription has run and plaintiff claims it has not run, then the burden shifts to plaintiff to prove interruption, suspension or nonapplicability.
Mix v. Mougeot 446 So. 2d 1352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Givens v. Fifth District Levee Board 445 So. 2d 781 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Thornell v. Payne & Keller, Inc. 442 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Gunter v. Plauche 439 So. 2d 437 La. 1983
Ray v. Alexandria Mall 434 So. 2d 1083 La. 1983
[7] See these closely analogous cases: Lunkin v. Triangle Farms, 208 La.
Chargois v. Fremin 430 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
and Baker v. Payne & Keller of La., Inc.
Slocum v. Daigre 424 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Trainer v. Aycock Welding Co. 421 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Bennett v. General Motors Corp. 420 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982