Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Katz v. Katz, 412 So. 2d 1291.

13 citing documents.

David Travasos v. Lafayette Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
David K. Groome and Norman Manton v. Earl T. Carr, Jr., Carr & Associates, Inc., Robert Lehman, Continental … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
Lee v. Sapp 265 So. 3d 898 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
art. 865 ; Katz v. Katz , , 1293 (La.
Labarre v. Occidental Chem. Co. 251 So. 3d 1092 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 1 Cir. 2/26/16) 2016 WL 770832 (unpublished), citing, , 1293 (La.
Greene v. Succession of Alvarado 210 So. 3d 321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana, Department of Children and Family Services, in the Interest of A.L. v. Thomas Robert Lowrie 167 So. 3d 573 La. 2015
Baton Rouge Police Department, 03-2682 (La.1/16/04), ; Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc., , 402 n. 2 (La.1980) (“Courts should look through the caption of pleadings in order to ascertain their substance and to do substantial justice to the parties.”).
Parish of Jefferson v. McGee 67 So. 3d 640 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
The Parish, notes that a motion to amend that seeks to alter the substance of the judgment may be considered a motion for new trial, but only if the motion is filed within the time delay for filing a motion for new trial.
Reese v. STATE DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY 866 So. 2d 244 La. 2004
Alcorn v. City of Baton Rouge 863 So. 2d 517 La. 2004
Bullock v. Harrell 646 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Matter of Succession of Stevenson 492 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Day v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board 431 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Williamson-Dickie Apparel Manufacturing Co. v. Hanger, Inc. 422 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
provides: “ ‘Every pleading shall be so construed as to do substantial justice.’ (C.C.P.