Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Guillory v. US Fidelity & Guar. Ins. Co., 420 So. 2d 119.

89 citing documents.

Walker v. Austin Power Co. 467 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Verrette v. Town of Ponchatoula 464 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Co., Guidry, supra; Myers v. Louisiana Ry.
Lemoine v. Brice Building Co. 465 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Connelly v. Buck Kreihs Co. 463 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Guillory v. United, States Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company, Urbi-na v. Alois J. Binder Bakery, Inc., (La.App.
Walton v. Normandy Village Homes Ass'n 460 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Co., “(w)here there is proof of an accident and of the following disability without any intervening cause it is presumed that the accident caused the disability.
Clark v. Park 'N Fly of Louisiana 459 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Mallet v. La. Nursing Homes, Inc. 459 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Morgan v. General Motors Corp. 459 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
& G., 3 Larsen, The Law of Workmen’s Compensation, § 80.33(d) (1983 Ed.) (discuss *90 ing Louisiana’s treatment of this presumption and similar presumptions recognized in West Virginia and Hawaii.)” In Robertson , a worker who injured his back was found to have a herniated disc a year and one-half later.
Doyle v. United General Ins. Co. 458 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Co., provides the law regarding the payment of benefits in this case, and, moreover, that just as defendant insurer's refusal to pay benefits in that case was held to be proscribed by LSA-R.S.
Francis v. Gervais F. Favrot Co. 455 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
23:1031 is that the employment causes the accident, the accident causes injury, and the injury causes disability.” Guillory v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Company, at 122 (La.1982).
Harris v. Board of Supervisors 451 So. 2d 1293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Guillory v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Company
Conrad v. Jack Donahue Contractors, Inc. 450 So. 2d 1035 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Young v. Hercules, Inc. 449 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Robertson v. Scanio Produce 449 So. 2d 459 La. 1984
See also, Guillory v. USF & G, 3 Larson, The Law of Workmen's Compensation, § 80.33(d) (1983 ed.) (discussing Louisiana's treatment of this presumption and similar presumptions recognized in West Virginia and Hawaii).
Blades v. Davis 446 So. 2d 958 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Delco v. Heritage Manor Nursing Home 441 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
King v. Wilson Bros. Drilling Co., Inc. 441 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Watson v. Louisiana Paving Co. 441 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
22:658, Guillory v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Co.
Roberts v. Sonic Drive in of Marksville 441 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Lennix v. St. Charles Grain Elevator Co. 439 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Guillory v. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Company
Robertson v. Scanio Produce & Institutional Foods, Inc. 435 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
& G, Bertrand v. Coal Operators Casualty Co., 253 La.
Fogleman v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Insurance Co. 433 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Co., at 122 (La.1982), the Supreme Court set out the following requirements for a successful claim under the worker’s compensation statute: “The requirements for a successful claim under this statute are thus personal injury which is the result of an accident, which accident in turn arises out of and in the course of empl
Beauclair v. Rockwood Insurance 430 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Co., as follows: “Clearly a worker’s pre-existing condition does not bar his recovery under the Louisiana Workers’ Compensation statute.
Shatoska v. Intern. Grain Transfer, Inc. 430 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Guillory v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Company
Roberts v. American Motorists Insurance 431 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Crocker v. Home Insurance Co. 428 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
In fairness to the District Court, we note that the instant case was decided on May 26, 1982, which was before the decisions reached in the following cases: Urbina v. Alois J. Binder Bakery, Inc., (La.App.
Gipson v. Dresser Industrial Valve Operations 428 So. 2d 1338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Co., where the plaintiff suf *1341 fered a fainting spell while on the job.
Gary v. Dimmick Supply Co. 427 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Hebert v. Lake Charles American Press 427 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Antilley v. Sentry Ins. Co. 426 So. 2d 1370 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Robichaux v. Terrebonne Parish Sch. Bd. 426 So. 2d 241 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Guillory v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Company
Ebarb v. Insurance Co. of North America 424 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Urbina v. Alois J. Binder Bakery, Inc. 423 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
the Louisiana Supreme Court set out "the legal principles related to the Louisiana scheme of workers' compensation," as follows: "1) Clearly a worker's pre-existing condition does not bar his recovery under the Louisiana Workers' Compensation statute.
Martin v. HB Zachry Co. 424 So. 2d 1002 La. 1982
Guillory v. USF & G Co., (La.
Daily v. Bechtel Power Corp. 420 So. 2d 1337 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Co., and Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.
Comeaux v. Cameron Offshore Services, Inc. 420 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Hammond v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York 419 So. 2d 829 La. 1982
Guillory v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Co., Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., (No. 81-C-3116).
Adams v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 418 So. 2d 485 La. 1982
See Guillory v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Co., Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., Bertrand v. Coal Operators Casualty Co., 253 La.
Guidry v. Sline Indus. Painters, Inc. 418 So. 2d 626 La. 1982
Co., No. 81-C-2471, rendered this day, addresses the issue of whether there was a causal connection between the accident which admittedly arose out of and in the course of Guillory's employment, and Guillory's subsequent disability.